The Congress has much at stake in the outcome of assembly elections in five states, particularly Uttar Pradesh, where its decision to abandon the original plan of contesting all seats is being viewed with some scepticism even within its own ranks….writes Sidhartha Dutta
The results on March 11 will decide if the Congress decision to ally with the Samajwadi Party and contest about a fourth of 403 seats in Uttar Pradesh will set the stage for the party’s revival in the country’s most populous state or make its path more difficult.
The Uttar Pradesh results are also likely to have a bearing on the party’s thinking on forging future alliances.
The Congress is hoping that the results in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Punjab, Manipur and Goa will end its electoral drought since the 2014 Lok Sabha polls, when it could manage only 44 seats in the 545-member house, which has 543 elected members.
The party has not won a major state on its own since that debacle. Quite apart from losing Assam, Kerala, Maharashtra and Rajasthan in the assembly elections, the reverses in local body elections in Maharashtra and Odisha have added to the challenges faced by the party.
The Congress entered into an alliance with the Samajwadi Party led by Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav in an apparent bid to stop its main electoral rival, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), from coming to power in Uttar Pradesh. It settled for 105 seats after some hard bargaining with the Samajwadi Party, which is contesting the remaining 298.
Some Congress leaders said that contesting all the 403 seats would have better served the party’s interests.
“During the Kisan Yatra we could see a revival of Congress. There were ticket aspirants for almost every seat in the state. But the alliance struck a blow to such hopes,” a senior leader, who did not want to be named, said.
He said the 26-day Kisan Yatra (Farmers’ Rally), which culminated in Delhi last October with a roadshow and rally of party Vice President Rahul Gandhi, was the right step in the party’s larger aim of returning to power on its own.
He said the party had already been relegated to the fourth position in Bihar, which, along with Uttar Pradesh, accounts for 120 Lok Sabha seats.
“A party which used to be number one or number two in almost all states, is now struggling to be number three or four party in those states,” he added.
Before its alliance in Uttar Pradesh, the Congress had been critical of the performance of the Samajwadi Party. The Congress had coined the slogan “Sataees saal, UP behaal. (UP has been in abysmal state for the past 27 years) to remind the people of its own rule in the 1980s and convey that the BJP, Bahujan Samaj Party and Samajwadi Party had failed to deliver.
Former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Ajit Jogi, who has floated his own party — Chhattisgarh Janata Congress (Jogi) — after quitting the Congress, said the “Congress party is getting finished on its own”.
“They are contesting 105 seats in Uttar Pradesh. What will happen to the workers in the remaining 300-odd seats? The workers will go here and there. In Bihar too they are fourth,” he said.
The issue of alliances has been a key debating point in the Congress since it went through a rough patch in the mid-1990s.
At a brainstorming session at Panchmari in Madhya Pradesh in 1998, the party said it considered “the present difficulties in forming one-party governments a transient phase” and pledged to restore itself to its primacy in national affairs.
Coalitions, it said, will be considered only when absolutely necessary and on agreed programmes. However, there was an apparent change of stance at the brainstorming session in Jaipur in 2013.
Jogi said that the Congress at Jaipur expressed its willingness to enter into a coalition “wherever it is needed to defeat the communal forces”.
The party has shown more flexibility on alliances since then. Its informal pact with the Communist Party of India-Marxist in the 2016 West Bengal poll came as a surprise to many. It had decided to be a junior ally of the Janata Dal-United and the Rashtriya Janata Dal in the 2014 elections to the Bihar assembly. There is also some speculation that the Congress may go for an alliance in the Gujarat assembly polls at the end of the year.
There were also noises that the Congress could offer outside support to the Shiv Sena to enable it to claim the mayor’s post in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation after the elections to the 227-member house threw up a 84-82 verdict with the BJP claiming the latter figure, but these were quickly shot down.
Political analysts said that going into alliance in Uttar Pradesh was a logical option for the Congress.
Senior journalist and political commentator Neerja Chowdhury said getting into winnable “alliances” was a workable strategy for the Congress.
“When a party is weak, it has to revive itself. Every party has used alliances as a means towards revival. The BJP won only two seats in the 1984 Lok Sabha elections. In 1989, it supported V. P. Singh at the Centre. This decision had a major advantage for the BJP in Uttar Pradesh and helped it come to power in the state,” Chowdhury said.
Chowdhury said if Samajwadi Party-Congress alliance can pull it off in Uttar Pradesh, the Congress will be in power in the state after nearly three decades.
She said election victories will change the mood in the Congress and answer those seeking to write off the party.
Columnist and political commentator Ashok Malik said there was “no evidence of the Congress reviving itself in Uttar Pradesh” and, therefore, an “alliance was the only alternative” in its goal to stop the BJP from coming to power in the state.
“I don’t think there is any evidence of Congress becoming strong in Uttar Pradesh by contesting on its own. If there was any evidence, then the alliance would not have happened,” Malik said.