December 6, 2021
2 mins read

London HC rules in favour of PM in Priti Patel case

In November last year, Sir Alex found that Patel had not always treated civil servants with “consideration and respect”…reports Ashis Ray

The London High Court has ruled against a petition filed by a trade union of senior civil servants for a judicial review of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s decision to overrule an independent investigation, which found Priti Patel, the Indian origin Home Secretary in his cabinet, guilty of “bullying” (read as wanting things done against the rules), which is a sackable offence under the ministerial code.

The FDA Union filed the case against the fact that Johnson had gone against the conclusion reached by Sir Alex Allan, then his independent adviser on ministerial standards, to protect Patel.

The two-judge bench said: “The question for this court is whether the Prime Minister proceeded on the basis that conduct would fall within the description of bullying with paragraph 1.2 of the ministerial code if the person concerned was unaware of, or did not intend, the harm or offence caused.”

It added: “Reading the statement (made by Johnson at the time) as a whole, and in context, we do not consider that the Prime Minister misdirected himself in that way.”

In November last year, Sir Alex found that Patel had not always treated civil servants with “consideration and respect”.

He went on to say in his report to Johnson: “Her approach on occasions has amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying in terms of the impact felt by the individuals. To that extent, her behaviour has been in breach of the ministerial code, even if unintentionally.”

The Prime Minister is the final arbiter on such complaints. His interpretation was that Patel was “unaware” of the disquiet she had caused. And that he had received an assurance from her that she was “sorry for inadvertently upsetting those with whom she was working”.

This, though, was not the first time that Patel had been accused of bullying and had forced the government to pay out cash compensation for the injury inflicted.

Sir Alex had resigned after Johnson did not take action on his inference.

The FDA stated: “The court has determined that the Prime Minister did not acquit the Home Secretary of bullying, and that he did not reject the findings of Sir Alex Allan that her conduct amounted to bullying.”

ALSO READ-Boris facing lawsuit for backing Priti Patel

Previous Story

Javid confirms community transmission of Omicron

Next Story

Facebook faces $200 bn legal action in UK over Rohingya genocide

Latest from -Top News

India-US Trade Talks Go Down to the Wire

The Indian trade negotiators have extended their stay in US, signalling a last-minute push to iron out key differences….reports Asian Lite News With the US tariff deadline fast approaching, Indian and American

Extreme Heat Chokes Europe

Although over 80 countries have developed national drought plans, the UNCCD warns that implementation remains a major gap…reports Asian Lite News Large swathes of Europe are being scorched by extreme heat and

Rashid Khan Condemns Taliban Education Clampdown

While advocating for women’s education, Rashid also highlighted the importance of trained healthcare professionals, especially for women….reports Asian Lite News Rashid Khan, one of Afghanistan’s most prominent cricketers, has publicly condemned the

Pakistani Handles Banned Again in India

The move comes in continuation of India’s escalating digital and diplomatic restrictions against Pakistan…reports Asian Lite News All Pakistani accounts on X have once again been blocked in India, after briefly becoming
Go toTop

Don't Miss

CHALO JAMVA with Khao Suppers | London

Chalo means come and Jamva means to eat, Chalo Jamva

Centre notifies appointment of 8 new HC judges, transfers six

In 2018, the top court’s collegium recommended Nargal, which was