August 4, 2023
3 mins read

SC Puts a Hold on Rahul Gandhi’s Conviction Over ‘Modi Surname’ Remark

In March, Gandhi faced disqualification as an MP following a conviction by a Surat court, leading to a two-year prison sentence for his comment on the prevalence of the surname “Modi” among thieves….reports Asian Lite News

In a big win for Rahul Gandhi, the Supreme Court on Friday stayed conviction of the former Congress President in the ‘Modi surname’ defamation case, which cost him his Lok Sabha membership, saying that no reasons were given by the trial judge for imposing the maximum punishment of two years in the case.

“If a constituency in Parliament goes unrepresented, is it not a relevant ground (to suspend conviction)? No whisper by the trial judge for the need to impose the maximum sentence. Not only the right of one individual is being affected, but the entire electorate of the constituency,” observed a bench comprising of Justices B.R. Gavai, P.S. Narasimha, and Prashant Kumar Mishra during the hearing. 

Further, the bench remarked that had Gandhi been awarded a sentence of 1 year, 11 months and 29 days, he would have been not disqualified as a Member of Parliament. 

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Gandhi, termed the conviction as “strange” while referring to many other judgements of the Supreme Court to justify that Gandhi’s conviction in the case deserves to be suspended. “Everybody aggrieved is a BJP office-bearer or a karyakarta (party worker),” he said.

On the other hand, senior advocate Jethamalani, appearing for the complainant BJP MLA in the defamation case, said that Gandhi’s intention was to defame every person with the surname ‘Modi’ just because it is the same as that of a Prime Minister. 

“You (Rahul Gandhi) have defamed an entire class out of malice,” he said. He also referred to the admonition awarded to Gandhi by the Supreme Court in 2019 in contempt proceedings over his remarks on the Rafale case.

The Supreme Court was hearing the plea filed by former Congress president against the Gujarat High Court’s verdict refusing a stay on his conviction in the ‘Modi surname’ defamation case.

On July 15, the Congress leader had approached the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat high court’s order where a bench of Justice Hemant Prachchhak had observed that granting a stay on his conviction would be an exception, and not a rule.

Gandhi was disqualified as an MP in March, after a Surat court convicted him and sentenced him to two years in prison for his “How come all thieves have Modi as the common surname” remark made during an election rally in Karnataka in April 2019. Gandhi’s remark was interpreted as an attempt to draw an implicit connection between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and fugitive businessmen Nirav Modi and Lalit Modi.

In March, the sessions court in Surat had dismissed Gandhi’s plea seeking suspension of his conviction by the magistrate court, stating that his disqualification will not result in an irreversible loss to him. The Congress leader was disqualified under a rule that bars convicted MPs from holding the Lok Sabha membership. 

According to legal experts, after the stay has been granted by the top court on Rahul Gandhi’s conviction, it will be sufficient to restore his Lok Sabha membership.

ALSO READ: Congress holds ‘maun satyagraha’ in Kerala against Rahul’s disqualification

Previous Story

Trump pleads not guilty, next hearing on Aug 28

Next Story

City centre Ajman hosts third edition of indoor run

Latest from Crime

Police arrest 474 at Palestine Action ban protest

Scores of people simultaneously unveiled handwritten signs with the message “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action” at the protest, organised by Defend Our Juries at Westminster’s Parliament Square Police have arrested

Balochistan: Where the State Makes People Disappear

The victims include students, journalists, and peaceful protesters, many of whom were abducted from cities such as Karachi and Islamabad….reports Asian Lite News A human rights organisation on Monday revealed that 785

US Jury Hits Tesla Hard

The verdict marks a rare courtroom loss for Tesla, which has typically avoided such trials by settling cases or securing dismissals. A federal jury in Miami has found Tesla partly responsible for

Jail for illegal migrant boat ads

Assisting illegal immigration to the UK is already a crime, but officials believe the offence would give police and other agencies more power to disrupt criminal gangs People advertising illegal Channel crossings

Pakistan’s Shame: 405 Honour Killings

On Saturday, dozens of civil society members and rights activists staged a protest in Quetta, demanding justice and an end to parallel justice systems. At least 405 honour killings were reported across
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Modi dials Palestinian President, vows aid

Modi reaffirms India’s commitment to provide the Palestinian people with

Modi may attend Asean Summit before G20 Summit

This potential visit underscores India’s foreign policy vision, emphasising the