May 15, 2024
4 mins read

Undeterred Sunak set to scrap graduate visa scheme

Sunak’s spokesperson has insisted ministers were not obliged to accept recommendations from the independent Migration Advisory Committee, which cautioned against closing the scheme in a report…reports Asian Lite News

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is still looking to restrict the UK’s graduate visa scheme to cut legal migration to Britain, even after he was strongly advised by the government’s migration adviser not to abolish the programme.

Sunak’s spokesperson has insisted ministers were not obliged to accept recommendations from the independent Migration Advisory Committee, which cautioned against closing the scheme in a report on Tuesday.

“British students should be the priority for our education system and universities and student visas must be used for education, not immigration,” the spokesperson said.

The MAC’s report said the government should retain the “graduate visa route” policy, which allows overseas students to spend two years working in the UK after graduation.

The committee warned cutting overseas student numbers would cause universities “substantial financial difficulty” and could lead some to “fail”.

The MAC’s recommendation followed an emergency review of the “graduate visa route” policy commissioned by home secretary James Cleverly in response to fears it was being used as a backdoor for immigration.

The report found “no evidence” of any deliberate and widespread abuse of the graduate route.

It came as Sunak faces calls from the right flank of his party to take a tougher line on legal migration, which reached a record net high of 745,000 in 2022 and remained high last year.

Polls invariably suggest migration is one of the top three issues concerning voters ahead of the general election, expected later this year. Sunak’s Conservatives are trailing Labour heavily in polling.

Senior Tories have been divided over whether to restrict the route. Chancellor Jeremy Hunt and education secretary Gillian Keegan have privately lobbied to retain the scheme in light of the severe financial strain many universities are under, said people familiar with the matter.

But former migration minister Robert Jenrick and former health minister Neil O’Brien, who released a scathing report attacking the Tory government’s legacy on migration last week, criticised the MAC’s findings.

Both former ministers argued on social media platform X that the report was guided by misleading parameters set by the government.

This included not asking the MAC to review the government’s goal of attracting 600,000 foreign students per year and asking it to assess the extent of abuse in the visa system, rather than the social and economic impact of this type of migration. Jenrick and O’Brien reiterated calls for the graduate route to be scrapped immediately.

The MAC warned putting further restrictions on the route — on top of a recent ban on international postgraduate students bringing family members to the UK — would lead to job losses, course closures and cuts to research, as well as the risk “that some institutions would fail”.

Any policy change intended to reduce student numbers would also need to explain “how the financial consequences for the sector would be addressed”, the committee stressed.

Although it found no deliberate abuse of the system, the MAC did raise concerns about the use of recruitment agents by universities and suggested the government consider introducing “mandatory requirements” on recruiters in order to ensure good practice.

Cleverly commissioned the MAC’s review after applications to lower-ranked universities more than doubled between 2018 and 2020.

The MAC found government policies to reduce migration introduced this year, including restrictions on postgraduate dependant visas, were having a negative impact on international recruitment.

Industry figures cited in the report indicated the number of international students paying a deposit to study in the UK had fallen 57 per cent in May compared with a year earlier.

‘Graduate Route visa, dominated by Indians’

A report issued by the British government reveals that a post-study visa programme, which is dominated by Indian graduates, is helping UK universities recover from financial losses and expand research opportunities. The Graduate Route visa, introduced in July 2021, allows international students to remain in the UK for up to two years (three years for PhD graduates) after completing their studies.

The government was reviewing the Graduate Route visa and that caused consternation among the international student community. In fact, applications to UK universities were dropped because of the visa programme uncertainty.

Cleverly assigned the independent Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) to review the new Graduate Route visa quickly. This visa permits international students to remain in the UK for up to two years after finishing their degree to seek employment and gain work experience.

The report suggested the government should continue the visa programme to attract “the brightest and best” international students to study in the UK.

According to the report, the top five nationalities account for nearly 75% of all Graduate Route visas with India accounting for over 40% of them. Indian nationals made up a higher proportion of Graduate Route visas (42%) compared to their proportion of student visas (26%).

ALSO READ-Country at crossroads, says Sunak

Previous Story

Zelensky Axes Travel Plans Amidst Kharkiv Tensions

Next Story

Seasonal Culinary Creations at its Best: W London

Previous Story

Zelensky Axes Travel Plans Amidst Kharkiv Tensions

Next Story

Seasonal Culinary Creations at its Best: W London

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.

UK and Germany Ratify Kensington Treaty

Britain and Germany ratify the Kensington Treaty, agreeing new cooperation on AI, quantum research, defence and security while targeting investment, jobs and Russian hybrid threats…reports Asian Lite News Desk Britain and Germany
Go toTop