July 6, 2025
3 mins read

Judge halts Trump from dismantling USADF

Congress established USADF as an independent agency in 1980, with the mandate to support economic development initiatives in Africa
XXX

In a significant legal development, a federal judge in Washington, DC, has temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle the US African Development Foundation (USADF), a federal agency that invests in small businesses across Africa. US District Judge Richard Leon ruled that President Trump violated federal law by appointing Pete Marocco as the new head of USADF without Senate confirmation. As a result, Marocco’s actions, which included terminating most of the agency’s employees and effectively ending its grant-making activities, have been deemed void and must be reversed.
Congress established USADF as an independent agency in 1980, with the mandate to support economic development initiatives in Africa. The agency’s board members are required to be confirmed by the US Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to USADF to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects, as well as other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. This funding was intended to foster growth and stability in these regions through targeted investments in local businesses and communities.
However, on February 19, President Trump issued an executive order directing the scaling back of several federal agencies, including USADF, to the minimum presence required by law. Trump also dismissed the agency’s board members and appointed Marocco as the board chair. This move was met with immediate legal challenges.
On May 21, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia, which works closely with the agency, filed a lawsuit challenging Marocco’s appointment. They argued that the deep cuts to the agency prevented it from fulfilling its congressionally mandated functions. The plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction, asserting that Marocco’s “slash-and-burn approach” threatened to destroy the agency before their lawsuit could be resolved. They cited the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, which they claimed prohibited Marocco’s appointment and required that any actions taken by an unlawfully appointed individual be undone.
Judge Leon’s ruling has been hailed as a victory for the rule of law and for the communities that rely on USADF’s work. Joel McElvain, senior legal adviser at Democracy Forward, the organization representing the plaintiffs, stated, “This is a victory for the rule of law and the communities that rely on USADF’s vital work. We will continue fighting against these power grabs to protect USADF’s ability to fulfill the mission that Congress gave it to perform.”
In response to the lawsuit, US Attorney Jeanine Pirro argued in court documents that the Federal Vacancies Reform Act does not apply to USADF and that the president has the authority to designate acting members of the agency’s board until the Senate confirms his nominees. Pirro also contended that any claims regarding the cuts themselves should be addressed in the Court of Federal Claims, rather than in federal district court.
Despite these arguments, Judge Leon found that while Trump had the legal authority to dismiss the previous members of the USADF board, Marocco’s appointment without Senate confirmation violated federal law. The judge’s decision has temporarily halted the dismantling of USADF, allowing the agency to continue its vital work in supporting African small businesses and economic development initiatives.
The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to established legal processes and the checks and balances inherent in the US government’s system. It also highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding executive authority and the need for transparency and accountability in the appointment of federal officials.
As the legal battle continues, the future of USADF remains uncertain. However, Judge Leon’s decision provides a temporary reprieve for the agency and the communities it serves, ensuring that its work can continue while the legal issues are resolved. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the agency’s future and for the broader debate on executive authority and the rule of law in the United States.

Previous Story

BRICS Bank Welcomes Colombia, Uzbekistan

Next Story

World Bank grants South Africa a $1.5 bn loan

Latest from -Top News

Trump Targets BRICS Allies with New Tariff

This move coincides with the ongoing BRICS summit being held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil…reports Asian Lite News US President Donald Trump has announced that an additional 10 per cent tariff will

BRICS Endorses India’s Stand on Terror

The treaty proposed by India within the UN framework aims to provide a comprehensive legal basis for combating terrorism….reports Asian Lite News The leaders’ joint statement, issued after the 17th BRICS summit

BRICS Slams US Tariff Hikes

The leaders criticised developed nations for using environmental issues to justify trade restrictions on developing countries….reports Asian Lite News Rio de Janeiro, July 7 (IANS) Embroiled in a trade war launched by

US Tariffs Pushed to August Amid Talks

In April, Trump announced a base tariff of 10 per cent on most of America’s trading partners and thereafter additional duties ranging up to 50 per cent….reports Asian Lite News US President

Indonesia Joins BRICS Bloc

This year’s BRICS Summit saw an expanded format, reflecting the grouping’s growing relevance in international affairs….reports Asian Lite News Prime Minister Narendra Modi formally welcomed Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto into the BRICS
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Japan Cancels U.S. Talks

The cancellation also coincides with Japan’s upcoming upper house elections

US cancels $400m in grants, contracts to Columbia University

The Trump administration declined to specify the grants and contracts