But the family putting down permanent roots at Windsor has cast uncertainty over Buckingham Palace’s future as the official London residence of the monarch…reports Asian Lite News
Britain’s future king Prince William and his family are moving to a new home on the royal Windsor estate, prompting uncertainty about the future of Buckingham Palace. They will reportedly move into Forest Lodge, an eight-bedroom mansion dating to the late 18th century, larger than their current four-bedroom home on the estate, west of London.
William and his wife Catherine, the Princess of Wales, are said to regard the property as their “forever home”, according to The Sun newspaper which broke the story, citing a source close to the couple. A Kensington Palace spokesperson confirmed “the Wales family will move house later this year”, without giving further details.
The Sun added that the couple were paying for the renovations, the move and the rent themselves, as insiders told the daily they were hoping for a “fresh start” following Kate’s 2024 cancer diagnosis and treatment. William and Catherine’s three children George, 12, Charlotte, 10, and Louis, seven, all attend a nearby school.
But the family putting down permanent roots at Windsor has cast uncertainty over Buckingham Palace’s future as the official London residence of the monarch.
“It would be a disaster if Buckingham Palace were sidelined,” royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams said. “It is an iconic building, comparable only to the White House and known worldwide,” he said.
Sovereigns have lived at Buckingham Palace since 1837. Located in the heart of London, not far from parliament and Number 10 Downing Street, it is also the venue for numerous royal events from summer garden parties to state banquets.
During the summer months, parts of the 755-room palace are open to the public. But King Charles III, 76, does not live there currently and will not do so for the foreseeable future amid an ongoing £369 million ($429 million) renovation.
The extensive work, which also saw the late queen Elizabeth II relocating to Windsor Castle before her death in 2022, is not due to be completed until 2027. Charles, who announced in early 2024 that he had been diagnosed with cancer, does plan to make Buckingham Palace his London base after the work is finished.
But he is widely reported to prefer the more homely Clarence House where he has lived since 2003. “It is the intention of King Charles and Queen Camilla to do so (move to Buckingham Palace) although given that he is battling cancer, this may well not happen,” Fitzwilliams said.
Like Charles, William is said to be keen to open up the vast palace to more tourists and expand royal events there, according to The Daily Mail. It is just one of a string of properties used by the royal family, either owned privately or by the Crown.
The late queen’s preferred homes were Windsor Castle and Balmoral Castle in Scotland, to which she would retreat every summer. Christmases were spent at Sandringham House in eastern England.
Charles meanwhile lavished attention on Highgrove House in western England, where he transformed the gardens, and he resides at Birkhall on the Balmoral estate when in Scotland. Other royal properties include the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh.
William and Catherine also enjoy a number of homes. Holidays are spent at Anmer Hall on the Sandringham estate and they have use of the vast apartment 1A at Kensington Palace in west London.
“There is the danger the monarchy is perceived to have too many homes,” Fitzwilliams said. But he added “those who criticise the monarchy’s costs should note that the Buckingham Palace renovation is on schedule and not exceeding its budget”.
Buckingham Palace would always have a vital role to play, he added. “It absolutely must remain the centre of the monarchy, whether or not William and Catherine actually live in it,” he said.
Daily Mail columnist Amanda Platell, however, cautioned about a less visible future king not being in residence at Buckingham Palace. A YouGov poll last year found that only a third (35 percent) of 18- to 24-year-olds wanted to maintain the monarchy, compared to “fairly broad” support in the population overall.
“I fear a future part-time king hiding away in Forest Lodge… could result in an even greater collapse of support among his subjects,” she wrote.
