June 23, 2023
8 mins read

Heartburn for China as India Cements Defence Ties with the US

The main agenda of Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the USA is stepping up defence cooperation between India and the U.S., setting a roadmap for industries in the defence sector to partner closely in co-production, co-development and maintaining supply chains … writes Kaliph Anaz

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s current visit to the USA is poised to set new benchmarks in bilateral ties between the biggest democracy and the oldest democracy in the world, alarm bells have started ringing in autocratic China.

The main agenda of the visit is stepping up defence cooperation between India and the U.S., setting a roadmap for industries in the defence sector to partner closely in co-production, co-development and maintaining supply chains, Indian Foreign Secretary Vinay Mohan Kwatra has been quoted as saying.

Fearing the prospect that the tables will now be turned against China along the India– China border across the great Himalayan range, President of China Xi Jinping has called upon border troops of China to forge a “great wall of steel” across the country’s frontiers by enhancing their capabilities in border defence and control.

From the offensive rhetoric of “teaching India a lesson again after 1962,” the tone has suddenly turned defensive. Deep down, the Communist Party of China has the feeling that its border with India along occupied Tibet is no longer that impregnable.

Though President Xi has made the statement following a visit to Inner Mongolia, his apprehensions have been about the situation on the China – India border. Foreign Minister of India S. Jaishankar has lately made it clear that till Chinese troops vacate all the disputed territories in eastern Ladakh there cannot be any improvement in India– China relations.

The statement of President Xi has also betrayed his apprehensions about the weakness and shortcomings of the People’s Liberation Army and the state of his government. He has highlighted the need for more cooperation in border defence among the ruling Communist Party of China and different departments of his government, the military, the law enforcement agencies and the ordinary people. He has also stressed on the need for more intensified training of troops, to enhance combat preparedness and meet the shortcomings in information technology-related border defence and control. President Xi has also spoken on the need for tightening military discipline, maintaining good troops on the border and strengthening the ranks of border defence professionals.

He has asked Chinese troops to have a stronger sense of mission and responsibility and the army to guard the border diligently, There is need for more cohesion among the border troops of China, President Xi has said. Clearly, with the PLA of China facing all these shortcomings, it will not be easy to build the great wall of steel.

The Pentagon indicated on June 9, 2023, the visit by the Indian Prime Minister to the USA would be marked by big announcements on defence industrial cooperation and boosting the indigenous military base of India.

“Among the priorities are clear strategic alignment around the question of co-development and co-production between the United States and India on the defence side. This is a priority for Prime Minister Modi to strengthen India’s indigenous defence industrial base, as well as advancing the military modernisation,” U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Ely Ratner has been quoted as saying in news agency reports from Washington.

“One of the major thrusts of the bilateral defence relationship and one of the things we were talking about, while we were in Delhi, is this ongoing US effort to support India’s military modernisation. The integration of our defence industrial base is more co-production, co-development, and I think that is based upon the belief that a stronger India that can defend its own interest and its sovereignty is good for the United States,” he said.

The initiative was believed to have been launched when National Security Advisor of India Ajit Doval met the U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan in January 2023 and launched the initiative for bolstering technology cooperation between the U.S. and India in the area of critical and emerging technology; with a strong defence component in it. Early in June 2023 U.S. Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin visited India to lay the groundwork for the visit of Narendra Modi and finalize particular agreements and initiatives.

One of the positive outcomes of the Indo – U.S. cooperation in the area of defence is immediately visible, the decision of New Delhi to acquire hi-tech drones from the United States. The Indian Defence Ministry has given approval for the acquisition of 31 armed MQ-9B Reaper drones. The high-altitude long-endurance drones are armed with strike missiles which can hit enemy targets with pinpoint accuracy. The drones will also be used for long-range surveillance along the borders and maritime areas of India.

The acquisition of these drones by India has come as bad news for China because all these years China had been surreptitiously nibbling into Indian territories along the international borders, taking advantage of the peaceful intentions of India. Beginning with 1958 when China built its Western Highway through Indian territories in Aksai Chin unnoticed, Beijing has adopted this tactic numerous times against India. In 1986, the Sumdorong Chu valley in Arunachal Pradesh was occupied by the Chinese army when unsuspecting Indian security forces had retreated temporarily from an observation post during the harsh winter. Then again in 2020, the Chinese army gained control of large parts of the disputed territories in eastern Ladakh; taking the chance of the unsettling conditions during the Covid-19 pandemic.

New Delhi has thus realized that Beijing is not to be trusted at any cost, and a hawk’s eye must be maintained to save Indian territories from predatory Chinese actions. These drones will help to maintain vigil on the border and take note of movements of the Chinese army and their intentions. The sophisticated weapon system on board the drones will also help the Indian army take preventive actions against aggressive Chinese moves.

In fact, unarmed versions of the deadly Predator series, MQ9 Guardian/Predator B, have already been leased from the USA as emergency procurement in the backdrop of the tension with China in Ladakh. These are also in service with the Indian Navy to maintain vigil in the Indian Ocean region.

Another focus area of importance in the field of cooperation between the American and the Indian militaries is the sharing of information. The importance of this exercise was demonstrated in the practical field on December 9, 2022, when the Indian army foiled an attempt by the Chinese army at land grab at Yangtse in the Tawang sector in Arunachal Pradesh; the way the Chinese did it in eastern Ladakh in April 2020.

According to reports from the U.S., India could repeal the Chinese military incursion in time because of unprecedented information sharing with the U.S. military. Indian troops were awaiting the arrival of Chinese troops into Indian territories. Aided by the advance information, they were fully prepared.

The information shared by the Pentagon included actionable satellite imagery and was more detailed and delivered more quickly than anything the U.S. had shared previously with the Indian military. The intelligence sharing arrangement was the result of an agreement signed between Washington and New Delhi in 2020 known as the Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement on Geospatial Cooperation.

This had apparently caught the Chinese army off-guard and forced the Communist Party of China to reconsider its strategy at land grabs along the border. Beijing, according to reports, was enraged; but no one has paid attention to the impotent rage.

Besides putting a stop to Chinese aggression along the India – China boundary, the other focus area of the defence cooperation between India and the USA is to protect the Indian Ocean region from aggressive Chinese designs, says the Pentagon. “We are also enhancing operational coordination in a number of different places. A lot of focus is on the Indian Ocean, a lot of focus on the undersea domain, as well as new domains, space and cyber and new efforts around information sharing,” the U.S. Assistant Secretary for Defense has been quoted as saying. “The USA and India share a vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific. A strong U.S.-India partnership is a critical ingredient to realizing this vision. Both sides have understood that a closer partnership is going to be essential to the manifestation of this vision.”

Besides the USA and India, several other world powers have been feeling the need to ensure a free, open and thriving Indo-Pacific in the backdrop of enhanced military manoeuvres of China in the region. Denying the claims of Taiwan, the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam, China is trying to establish its hegemony on the entire South China Sea; setting up artificial islands and military installations in the region.

Previous Story

Biden, Modi flags Pakistan-sponsored terrorism during bilateral talks

Next Story

Love for tea knows no bounds

Previous Story

Biden, Modi flags Pakistan-sponsored terrorism during bilateral talks

Next Story

Love for tea knows no bounds

Latest from Asia News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.

Economic tide is turning in Bangladesh

If there is one thing that can bring some comfort to the struggling Bangladeshi economy, it is good relations with India. Bangladesh should remember that Delhi’s backing, through easy supplies of essentials

DP World Lands 15-Year Bangladesh Port Deal

The agreement between the Chittagong Port Authority (CPA) and DP World covers the New Mooring Container Terminal…reports Asian Lite News Desk Bangladesh has signed a 15-year concession agreement with global ports operator

Nepal Floods Cause $1.66 Billion In Damage, Says World Bank

Nepal’s August 2026 floods caused an estimated US$1.66 billion in direct physical damage, with infrastructure accounting for 83 per cent of the total…reports Asian Lite News Desk Nepal’s devastating floods in August 2026 caused an estimated US$1.66 billion in direct physical damage, with infrastructure accounting for 83 per cent of the total, according to a World Bank report. The estimate, included in the World Bank’s Nepal Development Update unveiled this week, is close to the Nepal government’s preliminary Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA), which put physical damage at US$1.81 billion. The government’s assessment also estimated losses beyond physical assets at US$883.32 million, taking the total economic effects of the disaster to approximately US$2.7 billion. The World Bank’s Global Rapid Post-Disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) found that infrastructure suffered the greatest damage, estimated at US$1.38 billion, or 83 per cent of the total. Residential buildings accounted for US$185 million, or 11 per cent, while non-residential buildings sustained damage worth US$101 million, or 6 per cent. The floods along the Bhotekoshi and Trishuli rivers caused extensive damage to hydropower projects, solar energy facilities, electricity transmission infrastructure and transport networks. The energy sector, particularly hydropower, was among the worst affected. The August 2026 floods affected 12 hydropower projects and one solar project, involving 281.1 MW of operational capacity and 395.02 MW of capacity under construction. Damage to transmission lines and substations also disrupted the transmission of 149.6 MW of electricity to the national grid. The total affected capacity reached approximately 430.7 MW, equivalent to 10.6 per cent of Nepal’s installed hydropower and solar capacity at the end of fiscal year 2025-26, which concluded in mid-July. The disaster also severely damaged transport infrastructure along the 82-km Rasuwa trade corridor, which connects Kathmandu with the Rasuwagadhi border point with China. More than 55 km of the corridor was damaged, including 40 km that was completely destroyed. The floods also damaged 37 motorable bridges and 68 suspension bridges. The disaster resulted in significant human losses along the affected corridor and beyond. According to Nepal’s National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority, 1,455 people had been confirmed dead, while 5,285 remained missing following the disaster. The World Bank report found that the physical damage was concentrated in three districts in central Nepal: Rasuwa, Nuwakot and Dhading. Rasuwa was the worst-affected district, accounting for US$1.07 billion, or 64 per cent, of the total direct damage. Nuwakot recorded an estimated US$551 million in damage, while Dhading suffered approximately US$39 million. “The findings highlight the concentration of physical damage in a small number of districts and the disproportionate impact on infrastructure, underscoring the scale of the reconstruction challenge facing the affected areas,” the World Bank said. The global development financier said the floods had demonstrated the scale and complexity of disaster risks in Nepal’s Himalayan environment. The event also showed how a single extreme weather event could trigger cascading impacts across sectors and geographical areas. The report said recovery efforts should extend beyond restoring infrastructure to its pre-disaster condition. While the principle of “Build Back Better” remained relevant, the World Bank stressed that rebuilding infrastructure to higher engineering standards in the same locations might not always be sufficient. “In some cases, simply rebuilding the same infrastructure in the same location to a higher engineering standard may not be sufficient. Nepal may need to build differently — based on a better understanding of risk, more careful decisions about location and design, greater redundancy in critical networks, stronger monitoring and early warning, and a more integrated approach to infrastructure development in the Himalayas,” the report said. The World Bank said Nepal’s recovery strategy should incorporate improved risk assessment, more informed infrastructure planning, stronger monitoring systems and better early warning mechanisms. The report emphasised that reconstruction should not only restore damaged assets but also reduce the impact of future disasters, particularly in the country’s vulnerable Himalayan regions.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

US Judge blocks Biden admin from contacts with social media firms

The US has been debating over the past few years

World leaders pledge to end deforestation by 2030

The pledge to halt and reverse forest loss and land