June 8, 2025
3 mins read

UK Delays AI Regulation

UK Government Delays AI Regulation Bill by a Year, Plans Comprehensive Legislation to Address Safety and Copyright Concerns

Efforts to regulate artificial intelligence in the UK have been pushed back by at least a year, with ministers now preparing a sweeping legislative package to address safety concerns, copyright issues, and the rapid growth of AI technologies.

According to The Guardian, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle intends to introduce a comprehensive AI bill in the next parliamentary session. The legislation will tackle a wide range of concerns, from the testing of large language models like ChatGPT to the use of copyrighted material in AI training. However, the bill will not be ready before the next King’s Speech – anticipated as late as May 2026 – prompting concern over delays in regulating one of the world’s most transformative technologies.

Labour initially planned to introduce a tightly focused AI bill within months of taking office, targeting the oversight of advanced AI systems. This early legislation would have required companies to submit their models for safety testing by the UK’s AI Safety Institute, amid growing fears that unregulated AI systems could pose existential threats.

However, the plan was quietly shelved. Ministers are now opting to align with potential policy shifts in the United States, especially under the anticipated return of Donald Trump’s administration. There is concern that premature UK regulation might deter AI companies from investing or operating within the country.

Instead, ministers now envision a single, expansive bill that also includes new provisions on copyright – a hotly contested area in the AI space. The move comes amid escalating tensions with the creative sector over the government’s broader Data Protection and Digital Information Bill.

That bill currently allows AI companies to scrape copyrighted material for training purposes unless the content owner explicitly opts out. The provision has sparked an uproar from artists and rights holders, with figures like Elton John, Paul McCartney, and Kate Bush backing campaigns to challenge the measure.

Earlier this week, the House of Lords supported an amendment requiring AI developers to disclose whether copyrighted content was used in their models – a move aimed at upholding existing copyright protections. Despite the backlash, ministers have refused to amend the bill. While Kyle has publicly acknowledged shortcomings in the government’s handling of the issue, he has maintained that the data bill is not the appropriate vehicle for regulating AI copyright practices.

In a letter to MPs over the weekend, Kyle committed to forming a cross-party working group to advise on AI and copyright. He reiterated that these issues would be more effectively addressed through the planned AI-specific legislation.

Public sentiment strongly supports tighter government oversight. A March survey conducted by the Ada Lovelace Institute and the Alan Turing Institute found that 88% of respondents believed the government should have the authority to halt AI products that pose serious risks. More than three-quarters agreed that AI safety should be governed by public institutions rather than left solely to private firms.

As the UK continues to position itself as a leader in AI development, the delay raises critical questions about how swiftly and effectively policymakers can respond to both innovation and risk. The government’s broader AI strategy now hinges on the next parliamentary session – and whether its long-promised “comprehensive” approach will deliver both public trust and industry clarity.

Previous Story

Trump deploys National Guard in LA 

Next Story

India, Norway Ink Sea Deal

Previous Story

Trump deploys National Guard in LA 

Next Story

India, Norway Ink Sea Deal

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Govt considering EU-style common charging cable

It comes after the European Union passed a law on

‘No Labour wrongdoing in Harris campaign row’

Trump’s campaign filed a legal complaint alleging that apparent efforts