April 15, 2024
5 mins read

At UNSC, Iran defends attack on Israel as self-defense

Israeli officials have yet to release any comprehensive estimates of damage or casualties from the Iranian bombardment…reports Asian Lite News

After Iran conducted an unprecedented missile and drone attack against Israel in response to a deadly strike against its embassy complex in Syria, the Islamic Republic’s top diplomat in the United States issued a strongly worded letter outlining the legal basis behind the operation and a warning against further escalation.

The letter was written by Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Amir Saied Iravani and addressed to U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres and U.N. Security Council President Vanessa Frazier. It officially informed U.N. leadership that, “in the late hours of 13 April 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran carried out a series of military strikes on Israeli military objectives.”

The document referenced earlier warnings of a “decisive response” to Israel’s killing of seven Iranian military personnel. including two senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders, at an Iranian consular building in Damascus 10 days ago, an act that Iravani argued constituted a violation of the U.N. Charter.

“This action was in the exercise of Iran’s inherent right to self-defense as outlined in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations,” the letter said, “and in response to the Israeli recurring military aggressions, particularly its armed attack on 1st April 2024 against Iranian diplomatic premises, in the defiance of Article 2 (4) of the Charter of the United Nations.”

Article 2 (4) of the U.N. Charter states that, “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”

The historic Iranian attack comes, however, amid a long-running conflict between the arch-foes that has been significantly aggravated by the six-month war between the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Palestinian Hamas movement. With tensions already soaring across the Middle East, Iravani lamented the U.N. Security Council’s failure to act and warned it was Israel that had escalated the situation to the point that it necessitated a direct attack.

“Regrettably, the United Nations Security Council has failed in its duty to maintain international peace and security, allowing the Israeli regime to transgress red lines and violate the fundamental principles of international law,” Iravani wrote. “Such violations have exacerbated tensions in the region and threatened regional and international peace and security.”

Iravani reiterated Iran’s commitment to the U.N. Charter and asserted that “it does not seek escalation or conflict in the region.” At the same time, he emphasized that the Islamic Republic was prepared to take further action should Israel choose to strike back.

“While warning about any further military provocations by the Israeli regime,” Iravani wrote, “the Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms its unwavering determination to defend its people, national security and interests, sovereignty, and territorial integrity against any threat or acts of aggression and to respond to any such threat or aggressions vigorously and in accordance with international law.”

“The Islamic Republic of Iran will not hesitate to exercise its inherent right of self-defense when required,” he added. “Should the Israeli regime commit any military aggression again, Iran’s response will assuredly and decisively be stronger, and more resolute.”

Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. Gilad Erdan also reached out to the U.N. Security Council in the wake of the Iranian strike, which he referred to as a “clear violation of the UN Charter and international law” and a “severe and dangerous escalation” in his own letter.

He called on the U.N. Security Council to convene “immediately to unequivocally condemn Iran for these grave violations and immediately act to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization.”

Israeli officials have yet to release any comprehensive estimates of damage or casualties from the Iranian bombardment. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) reported Wednesday, in the aftermath of the attack, that Chief of the General Staff Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi was conducting a “situational assessment” with senior military officials.

Earlier, IDF spokesperson Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari stated that “the vast majority” of more than 200 Iranian cruise missiles and drones “were intercepted outside of the State of Israel’s borders by our Aerial Defense Array,” while he said at least one IDF base in southern Israel was hit and one child injured.

Meanwhile, Israel faced simultaneous attacks from other foes aligned with the broader Iran-backed “Axis of Resistance.”

From the northern border with Lebanon, the Hezbollah movement claimed at least two separate attacks “in support of our steadfast Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip and in support of their brave and honorable resistance, and in response to the Israeli night raids that targeted a number of safe villages and towns.” The IDF said it conducted retaliatory strikes against southern Lebanon in response.

Attacks were also reported from Yemen, which hosts the Ansar Allah, or Houthi, movement and from Iraq, home to an array of Iran-aligned militias that have operated under the banner of the “Islamic Resistance in Iraq” in that country and neighboring Syria.

In a statement issued late Wednesday, President Joe Biden stated that “Iran—and its proxies operating out of Yemen, Syria and Iraq—launched an unprecedented air attack against military facilities in Israel,” and issued his condemnation “in the strongest possible terms.”

Biden also credited U.S. military moves with helping Israel to defend against the Iranian attack.

“At my direction, to support the defense of Israel, the U.S. military moved aircraft and ballistic missile defense destroyers to the region over the course of the past week,” Biden said. “Thanks to these deployments and the extraordinary skill of our servicemembers, we helped Israel take down nearly all of the incoming drones and missiles.”

ALSO READ:

Previous Story

Rohit’s Century in Vain as CSK Clinch Victory

Next Story

GCC, Uzbek officials meet ahead of ministerial meeting

Previous Story

Rohit’s Century in Vain as CSK Clinch Victory

Next Story

GCC, Uzbek officials meet ahead of ministerial meeting

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.

UK and Germany Ratify Kensington Treaty

Britain and Germany ratify the Kensington Treaty, agreeing new cooperation on AI, quantum research, defence and security while targeting investment, jobs and Russian hybrid threats…reports Asian Lite News Desk Britain and Germany

Economic tide is turning in Bangladesh

If there is one thing that can bring some comfort to the struggling Bangladeshi economy, it is good relations with India. Bangladesh should remember that Delhi’s backing, through easy supplies of essentials
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Iran unveils ‘upgraded’ Bavar-373 missile

On the sidelines of the ceremony, the production line of

Netanyahu Meets Families of Hostages in US

Representatives of bereaved families who have lost their sons in