April 8, 2024
2 mins read

Yellen says US-China ties on stronger footing

Yellen highlighted the significant strides taken by the United States to stabilize its relationship with China…reports Asian Lite News

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s recent visit to China concluded with remarks indicating an improvement in the relationship between the United States and China. Yellen stated that the US-China relationship was on a stronger footing compared to the previous year. She emphasized the importance of recent diplomatic efforts aimed at stabilizing relations between the two economic giants. Yellen’s visit, spanning six days, was strategically designed to ease tensions and foster dialogue between the two countries.

Yellen highlighted the significant strides taken by the United States to stabilize its relationship with China. She noted that economic and financial officials from both nations would convene in working groups the following week to address US concerns regarding Chinese industrial oversupply. This move towards dialogue and cooperation underscores a concerted effort to find common ground and resolve contentious issues.

Acknowledging the complexity of the US-China relationship, Yellen emphasized that the progress made was not inevitable but a result of deliberate diplomatic efforts. President Biden’s directive to intensify diplomacy with China played a crucial role in laying the groundwork for improved relations. Yellen’s meetings with key Chinese officials, including economic advisors and central bank representatives, focused on a range of issues from industrial overcapacity to financial stability.

Despite the cordial tone of discussions, underlying tensions between the two nations persist. The United States remains vigilant regarding Chinese activities in areas such as the South China Sea. President Biden is expected to caution President Xi Jinping against such actions during their forthcoming discussions. Additionally, the Treasury has voiced concerns about China’s over-subsidization of its green-tech industry, warning against the potential ramifications of flooding global markets with cheap products.

Yellen drew attention to historical precedents, particularly China’s past practices in flooding global steel markets, which led to adverse effects on industries worldwide. The Treasury Secretary stressed that the Biden administration would not tolerate a similar scenario unfolding with green technologies. Such concerns are shared by US allies and partners, underlining the global significance of addressing Chinese industrial practices.

However, Chinese officials have refuted US claims of oversupply and subsidies. China’s Commerce Minister, Wang Wentao, asserted that the country’s renewable energy and electric vehicle industries were driven by innovation and market competition rather than subsidies. This response underscores the divergence in perspectives between the two nations on key economic issues.

Despite the disparities in viewpoints, both countries recognize the importance of dialogue and cooperation in maintaining stability and promoting economic growth. While challenges remain, efforts to engage in constructive dialogue and address mutual concerns are vital for navigating the complexities of the US-China relationship.

ALSO READ: Biden raises $90 mn, widens fundraising lead

Previous Story

Trump plans to pressure Ukraine to cede land to Russia  

Next Story

UN seeks $620m to support Afghan migrants

Previous Story

Trump plans to pressure Ukraine to cede land to Russia  

Next Story

UN seeks $620m to support Afghan migrants

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

US mulls supplying fighter jets to Ukraine

This move would expand US involvement in war and risk

Patriot guided missile systems arrive in Ukraine

The missiles are the latest contribution from Western allies, who