September 18, 2026
3 mins read

Africa’s China Trade Test

China’s tariff-free access opens a vast market for Africa, but governments face pressure to move beyond raw commodities and build higher-value industries, reports Africa Daily News Desk

China’s decision to remove tariffs on imports from 53 African countries is opening a major new market for the continent, but African governments face a bigger challenge in turning increased access into industrial growth and higher-value exports.

The zero-tariff policy, which took effect on May 1, covers 100 per cent of tariff lines for African countries that maintain diplomatic relations with Beijing. The measure has been presented as an opportunity to expand African exports, attract investment and encourage manufacturing, but officials and business leaders say lower tariffs alone will not solve the continent’s longstanding trade imbalance with China.

The issue was a central theme at an international seminar in Abuja on August 14, attended by nearly 500 government officials, diplomats, academics, business leaders and representatives of regional organisations.

The discussions highlighted a fundamental question for African economies: whether they can use easier access to the Chinese market to export more finished and processed products rather than continuing to rely heavily on raw materials.

Nigeria’s Minister of State for Agriculture and Food Security, Aliyu Sabi Abdullahi, warned against treating tariff relief as a solution by itself. Nigerian officials said the priority should be to increase local processing and move agricultural products, minerals and other commodities further up the value chain before they are exported.

Nigeria’s Foreign Ministry also said Africa needed to focus on what it produces, how products are manufactured and how much economic value remains within African countries.

That concern is reflected in the structure of China-Africa trade. Trade between China and Africa reached a record $348 billion in 2025, according to Chinese customs data. But Chinese exports to Africa were worth about $225 billion, compared with $123 billion of African exports to China, leaving Africa with a deficit of roughly $102 billion.

The composition of that trade is as significant as its size. African exports to China remain heavily concentrated in commodities, including crude oil, copper, cobalt and iron ore, while Chinese exports to African markets are dominated by manufactured and higher-value goods such as machinery, electronics and green technologies.

The result is a trading relationship in which African countries have gained access to a huge consumer market but have struggled to capture a larger share of the value generated from their natural resources.

The new tariff regime could begin to change that if African countries expand processing capacity, improve product quality and build reliable supply chains.

There are already signs of stronger trade flows since the policy came into effect. Chinese officials said imports from Africa rose sharply after May 1, while Nigerian reports have pointed to a significant increase in Nigerian exports to China. At the Abuja seminar, Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria Yu Dunhai said China-Africa trade had reached $207 billion in the first half of 2026, while Nigerian exports to China had also recorded strong growth.

The early gains include agricultural products and other goods that can enter China without tariffs. South African apples, Kenyan avocados and products from countries including Benin, Rwanda, Madagascar, Ghana, Tunisia and Nigeria have been among the African goods entering the Chinese market under the expanded arrangements.

However, economists and policymakers face the question of whether such exports can develop into sustained industrial value chains.

Nigeria has identified local processing, stronger manufacturing capacity, improved product standards and more reliable supply chains as priorities. Its government has also linked the opportunity to the African Continental Free Trade Area, arguing that stronger regional value chains could help African producers reach the scale required to compete internationally.

For China, the policy is also intended to encourage greater investment and cooperation. Beijing says tariff-free access can encourage Chinese companies to establish processing and manufacturing operations in Africa, allowing producers to integrate more closely with global supply and value chains.

The challenge for African economies is therefore broader than simply increasing shipments to China. Without investment in electricity, transport, finance, skills, technology, manufacturing and agricultural processing, the continent risks exporting larger volumes of commodities while continuing to import finished products.

The zero-tariff policy removes one barrier to African exports. Whether it produces a lasting shift in the continent’s economic structure will depend on what African countries do with that access.

Newsdesk

Newsdesk

Aravind Rajeev is Deputy News Editor at Asian Lite, mostly covering the Middle East and GCC. He has over eight years of experience as a journalist, with a background in ground-level reporting, crime reporting, as well as international and regional news.

Previous Story

Jaishankar Meets Bhutan King

Next Story

US Targets South African Officials

Previous Story

Jaishankar Meets Bhutan King

Next Story

US Targets South African Officials

Latest from -Top News

India Funds Hindi News Service at UN

Hindi continues to retain its non-official language status at the United Nations, with India voluntarily funding initiatives to share UN news and information in the language…reports Asian Lite News Desk Hindi continues

Houthis Claim Missile Strike on Riyadh Airport

Yemen’s Houthi group claims a ballistic missile struck Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport, with Saudi authorities yet to confirm the latest attack…reports Asian Lite News Desk Yemen’s Houthi group has claimed responsibility

US Green Card Freeze Hits Indian IT Giants

The Trump administration has suspended employment-based green card processing for eight major technology companies, including Infosys, TCS, Wipro and HCL, citing ongoing investigations…reports Asian Lite News Desk The Trump administration has suspended a key employment-based green card process for eight major technology and outsourcing companies, including Indian IT giants Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services, Wipro and HCL, as Vice President JD Vance announced a crackdown on alleged visa fraud. The suspension, announced on Thursday by US Labour Secretary Keith Sonderling at a press conference led by Vance, also covers Cognizant, Capgemini, Microsoft and Adobe. It bars the companies from filing new permanent labour certification applications and halts the processing of pending applications under the programme. Sonderling said the decision followed ongoing criminal and federal investigations into the companies. “Due to ongoing criminal investigations led by the Department of Labour’s Inspector General Anthony DiEsposito, who will get into this shortly, I am hereby suspending from the Permanent Labour Certification Program some of the largest IT outsourcing firms in the world, Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL, and Capgemini,” Sonderling said. He added that Microsoft and Adobe were also being suspended because of multiple active federal investigations. “We will not accept or process any pending permanent labour certification applications involving these companies,” he said. The Permanent Labour Certification programme, commonly known as PERM, is a key step in the process through which employers sponsor foreign workers for employment-based permanent residence in the United States. According to figures presented by Sonderling, the eight companies had collectively requested nearly three million foreign workers since 2009. They had received more than 230,000 H-1B visa approvals and over 100,000 permanent labour certifications. The administration did not disclose company-specific findings or provide details of the alleged violations during the press conference. Vance accused employers of using the H-1B visa programme to replace American workers with lower-paid foreign employees. He said the programme was intended to help companies recruit highly skilled workers for positions that could not be filled by American employees. “The H-1B visa program is meant to allow companies to bring in really the best of the best from outside the United States of America for positions that are completely impossible to fill with American workers,” he said. Vance singled out Microsoft, alleging that the company had laid off 6,000 American workers while benefiting from 6,300 H-1B visas and nearly 3,000 green cards. He said the administration wanted companies to change their hiring practices rather than withdraw from the American market. Asked whether the suspension would be temporary or permanent, Vance said, “The suspension of PERM is gonna last as long as it needs to.” He added that the administration had the tools to continue the suspension indefinitely but wanted the companies to improve their conduct. The US Justice Department also announced that it was actively investigating companies suspected of favouring foreign workers over American employees. Attorney General Todd Blanche said the authorities could pursue criminal prosecutions and civil lawsuits as part of the enforcement measures. The decision could have significant implications for Indian technology professionals and outsourcing companies operating in the United States, where Indian firms have long relied on employment-based immigration programmes to deploy skilled workers to American clients. The H-1B visa programme allows US employers to hire foreign workers in qualifying specialised occupations on a temporary basis. PERM, meanwhile, is part of a separate process through which employers seek to sponsor eligible foreign workers for permanent residence. The suspension announced on Thursday specifically concerns permanent labour certification applications involving the eight named companies. It does not, by itself, establish the cancellation of existing H-1B visas or green cards. The impact on individual employees will depend on their immigration status and the stage of their applications. The administration did not provide a detailed timeline for the suspension or specify when processing might resume.

Nepal Floods Cause $1.66 Billion In Damage, Says World Bank

Nepal’s August 2026 floods caused an estimated US$1.66 billion in direct physical damage, with infrastructure accounting for 83 per cent of the total…reports Asian Lite News Desk Nepal’s devastating floods in August 2026 caused an estimated US$1.66 billion in direct physical damage, with infrastructure accounting for 83 per cent of the total, according to a World Bank report. The estimate, included in the World Bank’s Nepal Development Update unveiled this week, is close to the Nepal government’s preliminary Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA), which put physical damage at US$1.81 billion. The government’s assessment also estimated losses beyond physical assets at US$883.32 million, taking the total economic effects of the disaster to approximately US$2.7 billion. The World Bank’s Global Rapid Post-Disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) found that infrastructure suffered the greatest damage, estimated at US$1.38 billion, or 83 per cent of the total. Residential buildings accounted for US$185 million, or 11 per cent, while non-residential buildings sustained damage worth US$101 million, or 6 per cent. The floods along the Bhotekoshi and Trishuli rivers caused extensive damage to hydropower projects, solar energy facilities, electricity transmission infrastructure and transport networks. The energy sector, particularly hydropower, was among the worst affected. The August 2026 floods affected 12 hydropower projects and one solar project, involving 281.1 MW of operational capacity and 395.02 MW of capacity under construction. Damage to transmission lines and substations also disrupted the transmission of 149.6 MW of electricity to the national grid. The total affected capacity reached approximately 430.7 MW, equivalent to 10.6 per cent of Nepal’s installed hydropower and solar capacity at the end of fiscal year 2025-26, which concluded in mid-July. The disaster also severely damaged transport infrastructure along the 82-km Rasuwa trade corridor, which connects Kathmandu with the Rasuwagadhi border point with China. More than 55 km of the corridor was damaged, including 40 km that was completely destroyed. The floods also damaged 37 motorable bridges and 68 suspension bridges. The disaster resulted in significant human losses along the affected corridor and beyond. According to Nepal’s National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority, 1,455 people had been confirmed dead, while 5,285 remained missing following the disaster. The World Bank report found that the physical damage was concentrated in three districts in central Nepal: Rasuwa, Nuwakot and Dhading. Rasuwa was the worst-affected district, accounting for US$1.07 billion, or 64 per cent, of the total direct damage. Nuwakot recorded an estimated US$551 million in damage, while Dhading suffered approximately US$39 million. “The findings highlight the concentration of physical damage in a small number of districts and the disproportionate impact on infrastructure, underscoring the scale of the reconstruction challenge facing the affected areas,” the World Bank said. The global development financier said the floods had demonstrated the scale and complexity of disaster risks in Nepal’s Himalayan environment. The event also showed how a single extreme weather event could trigger cascading impacts across sectors and geographical areas. The report said recovery efforts should extend beyond restoring infrastructure to its pre-disaster condition. While the principle of “Build Back Better” remained relevant, the World Bank stressed that rebuilding infrastructure to higher engineering standards in the same locations might not always be sufficient. “In some cases, simply rebuilding the same infrastructure in the same location to a higher engineering standard may not be sufficient. Nepal may need to build differently — based on a better understanding of risk, more careful decisions about location and design, greater redundancy in critical networks, stronger monitoring and early warning, and a more integrated approach to infrastructure development in the Himalayas,” the report said. The World Bank said Nepal’s recovery strategy should incorporate improved risk assessment, more informed infrastructure planning, stronger monitoring systems and better early warning mechanisms. The report emphasised that reconstruction should not only restore damaged assets but also reduce the impact of future disasters, particularly in the country’s vulnerable Himalayan regions.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

China’s Defence Budget Defies Economic Woes

China’s 2024 defence budget will rise 7.2 per cent to

Protests in China against Covid curbs

At one point a large group began shouting, “Down with