May 22, 2026
4 mins read

‘Economic, Not Political’: UAE Defends OPEC Move

UAE defends OPEC exit as a strategic economic decision, signalling a shift towards greater flexibility, investment freedom and long-term energy leadership without abandoning global market stability, reports Asian Lite News Desk

The UAE has sought to draw a clear line between geopolitics and economics following its decision to exit OPEC and the wider OPEC+ alliance, with senior officials insisting the move reflects long-term national strategy rather than political divergence.

Energy and Infrastructure Minister Suhail Mohamed Al Mazrouei said the decision was the outcome of a comprehensive review of the country’s production policy, capacity expansion and future ambitions, stressing that it was rooted entirely in the UAE’s national interest.

In a public statement, Al Mazrouei emphasised that the move should not be interpreted as a rupture with partners or a signal of division within the oil-producing bloc. Instead, he framed it as a sovereign economic choice aimed at strengthening the UAE’s position as a reliable global energy supplier while allowing greater flexibility to expand production and investment.

“The UAE has always acted as a responsible producer,” he said, adding that independence would not come at the cost of global market stability. Officials have reiterated that the country will continue to engage with former partners, albeit on its own terms, maintaining cooperation where it aligns with shared interests.

The UAE’s exit marks a significant moment in the evolution of global oil markets. A member of OPEC since 1967—prior to the country’s formal establishment—the UAE has long been one of the group’s most influential producers, second only to Saudi Arabia in its ability to adjust output during times of crisis.

Its departure comes as the global energy landscape undergoes rapid transformation, shaped by geopolitical tensions, fluctuating demand and increasing competition among producers. Analysts say the UAE’s move reflects a broader recalibration, as countries with substantial reserves and spare capacity seek greater autonomy in responding to market conditions.

Before the current regional conflict disrupted production flows, the UAE was pumping just over three million barrels per day, largely in line with OPEC+ quotas. Abu Dhabi has since been working toward significantly expanding its production capacity, targeting nearly 4.9 million barrels per day in the coming years.

However, output has been temporarily constrained by the ongoing crisis, with production currently estimated between 1.8 and 2.1 million barrels per day. The disruption has underscored the importance of flexibility—both in production strategy and in export infrastructure—as producers navigate an increasingly volatile environment.

Flexibility over quotas

Industry experts note that one of the UAE’s key advantages lies in its spare production capacity, a critical buffer that can be brought online quickly to stabilise markets during supply shocks. Alongside Saudi Arabia, the UAE controls a significant portion of the world’s readily available spare capacity, giving it outsized influence during periods of disruption.

By stepping away from OPEC+, the UAE is effectively freeing itself from production quotas that may limit its ability to respond swiftly to changing market conditions. The move is expected to enable more aggressive investment in upstream capacity and allow the country to optimise output in line with its economic priorities.

At the same time, officials have been keen to stress that the decision does not signal a retreat from global responsibility. Al Mazrouei said the UAE remains committed to balancing supply and demand, contributing to market stability even as it operates independently.

The decision to exit OPEC+ is also closely tied to the UAE’s broader economic transformation agenda, which seeks to integrate energy policy with industrial growth, technology development and long-term diversification.

Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology and Group Chief Executive of ADNOC, described the move as a “carefully considered strategic decision” aligned with national development goals. He emphasised that it was not directed against any country or institution, but rather designed to enhance the UAE’s ability to invest, expand and create value across sectors.

Al Jaber highlighted how the country is increasingly linking its energy strategy with emerging industries such as artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing and critical minerals. This integrated approach is intended to position the UAE not just as a major oil producer, but as a key player in the broader global economy of the future.

“Real strength is not measured by the abundance of resources, but by how they are harnessed,” he said, underlining the shift from volume-driven production to value-driven growth.

Despite its departure from OPEC+, the UAE has sought to reassure markets that it will remain a dependable supplier. Officials have pointed to decades of investment in infrastructure, logistics and partnerships as evidence of the country’s commitment to reliability.

Previous Story

Trump Pledges 5,000 More Troops to Poland

Next Story

UAE Defies Hormuz with Mega Pipeline

Previous Story

Trump Pledges 5,000 More Troops to Poland

Next Story

UAE Defies Hormuz with Mega Pipeline

Latest from Arab News

pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.

Houthis Claim Missile Strike on Riyadh Airport

Yemen’s Houthi group claims a ballistic missile struck Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport, with Saudi authorities yet to confirm the latest attack…reports Asian Lite News Desk Yemen’s Houthi group has claimed responsibility

Saudi Arabia to receive forces under Mecca Defence Alliance

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkiye have activated collective-defence commitments, agreeing to deploy military capabilities as regional tensions and threats against the Kingdom persist…reports Asian Lite News Desk Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkiye

India-UAE Trade Ties in Focus

India and the UAE have discussed expanding bilateral trade, investment and business partnerships amid broader economic cooperation…reports Asian Lite News Desk India and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) discussed ways to further
Go toTop

Don't Miss

UAE Leaves OPEC To Reshape Energy Future

UAE exits OPEC and OPEC+, signalling a strategic shift towards