April 10, 2026
3 mins read

War of Words Erupts as Pakistan Minister Criticises Israel

The remarks were made less than 50 hours ahead of critical diplomatic negotiations in Islamabad, where Pakistan is set to host talks between the United States and Iran as part of broader efforts to ease regional tensions….reports Asian Lite News

A new diplomatic dispute has emerged after Pakistan’s Defence Minister, Khawaja Muhammad Asif, issued strongly critical comments regarding Israel, prompting swift condemnation from Israeli officials, U.S. lawmakers, and policy experts at a particularly sensitive stage in ongoing ceasefire negotiations.

Asif wrote on X that “Israel is evil and a curse for humanity,” alleging that “genocide is being committed in Lebanon” and that “innocent citizens are being killed by Israel, first Gaza, then Iran and now Lebanon.” He added: “I hope and pray people who created this cancerous state on Palestinian land to get rid of European jews burn in hell.”

The comments came less than 50 hours before high-stakes diplomatic talks in Islamabad, where Pakistan is hosting discussions between US and Iran linked to broader regional tensions.

Reacting sharply, Israel’s Prime Minister’s Office said: “Pakistan Defence Minister’s call for Israel’s annihilation is outrageous. This is not a statement that can be tolerated from any government, especially not from one that claims to be a neutral arbiter for peace.”

US Congressman Josh Gottheimer also criticised the remarks, calling them “vile rhetoric targeting Jews and Israel.” He said: “Hateful rhetoric like this is beyond unacceptable and unproductive at this fragile moment. This is not diplomacy and must be condemned.”

The controversy has cast a shadow over Pakistan’s role as a mediator. Islamabad has been positioning itself as a venue for talks involving the United States and Iran, amid escalating tensions in the Middle East.

Criticism also emerged from other commentators. Emily Schrader described the remarks as a “Jew hating diatribe,” quoting Asif’s statement that “Israel is evil and curse for humanity….I hope and pray people who created this cancerous state on Palestinian land to get rid of European jews burn in hell.” She added: “Pakistan is not an impartial actor and they should not be permitted to mediate anything.”

Former US official Ellie Cohanim also questioned Islamabad’s role, saying: “Many of us were concerned by the idea of the country which harbored & sheltered 9/11 mastermind Osama Bin Laden to serve as any kind of ‘mediator’ role.” She added that “with this statement Pakistan managed to blow any notion of objectivity or distance from the radical Islamist agenda.”

Observers noted that the timing of the post — as delegations were arriving and security arrangements were being finalised — raised questions about the host country’s perceived neutrality.

The remarks also follow earlier confusion over a ceasefire announcement attributed to Pakistan’s leadership. That announcement had suggested the ceasefire applied “everywhere including Lebanon,” a position later contradicted by Israel, which clarified that Lebanon was not included.

The Israeli position, as reiterated by its leadership, is that operations in Lebanon are separate from the broader ceasefire framework. The Israeli military has continued operations against Hezbollah, including what was described as a major bombardment on April 8.

The sequence of events — first the ceasefire scope ambiguity and now the defence minister’s comments — has led to criticism that Pakistan’s role as mediator is being undermined at a critical juncture.

Despite the controversy, preparations for the talks in Islamabad have continued, with extensive security measures in place and international delegations already on the ground.

The diplomatic stakes are high. The talks are being described as one of the most significant US-Iran engagements in decades, with regional stability hanging in the balance.

Previous Story

India backs Vietnam defence leadership

Next Story

World Bank Chief Looks to India for Jobs Blueprint

Previous Story

India backs Vietnam defence leadership

Next Story

World Bank Chief Looks to India for Jobs Blueprint

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.

UK and Germany Ratify Kensington Treaty

Britain and Germany ratify the Kensington Treaty, agreeing new cooperation on AI, quantum research, defence and security while targeting investment, jobs and Russian hybrid threats…reports Asian Lite News Desk Britain and Germany

Economic tide is turning in Bangladesh

If there is one thing that can bring some comfort to the struggling Bangladeshi economy, it is good relations with India. Bangladesh should remember that Delhi’s backing, through easy supplies of essentials
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Hilary trolls Trump after FBI raid

Clinton herself was investigated by federal authorities, and she was

US mulls supplying fighter jets to Ukraine

This move would expand US involvement in war and risk