December 12, 2023
3 mins read

Democrats Divided on Israel Aid in Congress

The White House has re-calibrated its position in response and publicly pushed Israel towards a pause in fighting for humanitarian relief and minimise damage to civilians…reports Asian Lite News

While it’s Democrats versus Republicans in the congressional squabbling over security aid for Ukraine, it’s Democrats versus Democrats over aid to Israel. Both fronts remain open and unresolved. Bernie Sanders, an Independent senator, who works with Democrats, was the only non-Republican to vote against a $111 billion security package for Ukraine and Israel on Wednesday.

He was joined by Democrat Charles Schumer, who flipped his vote to “no” later so that he could bring up the bill again later. The legislation was defeated 49-51. “I do not believe that we should give the right-wing extremist Netanyahu government an additional $10.1 billion dollars with no strings attached to continue their inhumane war against the Palestinian people,” Sanders said about his no-vote. Although an Independent, Sanders has been an appendage of the Democratic party, working and voting with it mostly and he ran twice for the party’s nomination for president. He also leads the Democratic party left-leaning progressive wing that has called for a ceasefire in Gaza and more attaching conditions to the part of the security package meant for Israel.

The New York Times has reported that around 20 Democratic senators have expressed concerns about how Israel may use the US assistance at a meeting at the White House with National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan on Tuesday, the day before the vote. “We want the president to secure express assurances from the Netanyahu government regarding a plan to reduce the unacceptable level of civilian casualties, and we want the Netanyahu coalition to commit to full cooperation with our efforts to provide humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza,” Senator Chris Van Hollen, one of the leaders of this group effort, has said. He was referring to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “The bottom line is we need those express assurances. How we achieve that is something that we are discussing right now.”

The Israeli prime minister is personally unpopular with Democrats for his right-wing policies — such as the push for Israeli settlers in West Bank, which would go in totality to Palestine in the eventuality of its creation under the two-state formula that has widespread support in the world as the only solution to the West Asia problem that has seen multiple wars. Netanyahu’s push for judicial reforms essentially diminished the authority of the Supreme Court — played badly with the Democrats and the Biden administration, which had openly and publicly asked him not to rush it. But since October 7, when Hamas carried out a terrorist attack on Israel, Biden has demonstrated an unwavering support for Israel, which has been criticized by fellow Democrats and Muslim Americans, who have resolved to not vote for his re-election bid.

The White House has re-calibrated its position in response and publicly pushed Israel towards a pause in fighting for humanitarian relief and minimise damage to civilians. Talks are on to clear the security package sought by the Biden administration. There is a suggestion now, however, to split aid for Israel from the overall package. It’s come from Republicans who are generally more in agreement among themselves on Israel than on Ukraine, although there are plenty of them who are still all-in on funding Kyiv’s valiant fight against Russia.

ALSO READ-Biden Risks Losing His Job Over Ukraine

Previous Story

Indian-Origin Journalist Slams US Universities for Political Agendas

Next Story

Tibetans Celebrate Dalai Lama’s Nobel Peace Prize Anniversary

Previous Story

Indian-Origin Journalist Slams US Universities for Political Agendas

Next Story

Tibetans Celebrate Dalai Lama’s Nobel Peace Prize Anniversary

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Biden Hints at ‘Other Team’ in Gaza Hospital Attack

While Palestinian officials have blamed Israel for the incident, Israelis

BJP to corner Congress over ‘lapse’ in PM’s security

The BJP MPs will stage the silent dharna at the