February 5, 2026
2 mins read

Budget Tightens Crypto Oversight

The announcement comes at a time when segments of the crypto industry had been hoping for relief in the form of lower taxes or measures to improve liquidity

The Union Budget 2026–27 has signalled a tougher regulatory stance on the fast-growing crypto ecosystem, proposing a new penalty framework aimed at tightening transaction reporting and ensuring greater transparency. Presented in Parliament by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, the proposal makes it clear that accountability and compliance will take precedence in the government’s approach to digital assets.

At the heart of the move is a plan to introduce penalties for entities that fail to report crypto-asset transactions or furnish inaccurate information. The measures are intended to strengthen compliance with Section 509 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, and to act as a deterrent against non-reporting and incorrect disclosures within the crypto sector.

Under the proposed rules, crypto platforms and other reporting entities will face a penalty of Rs 200 per day for failing to submit prescribed statements of crypto transactions within the stipulated timeline. In cases where inaccurate particulars are provided and not corrected within the allowed period, a fixed penalty of Rs 50,000 has been proposed.

Explaining the rationale behind the move, the finance minister said the new penalty provisions are designed to enforce existing reporting obligations and discourage non-compliance. The Finance Bill makes it explicit that these penalties are directly linked to the reporting requirements outlined under the Income-tax Act, 2025, leaving little ambiguity about the government’s intent.

The announcement comes at a time when segments of the crypto industry had been hoping for relief in the form of lower taxes or measures to improve liquidity. Instead, the Budget has taken a firm stance, signalling that regulatory discipline and accurate reporting will come before any easing of the tax burden.

While the measures may appear stringent, several industry voices view the proposal as a step towards long-term regulatory clarity rather than a purely punitive action. Stricter reporting norms, they argue, could help integrate crypto assets more closely with India’s mainstream financial system by enhancing transparency and building greater trust among investors and regulators alike.

The new penalty provisions are proposed to come into effect from April 1, 2026. Under the earlier framework, crypto exchanges and other reporting entities were already required to submit transaction statements to the Income-tax Department. However, there were no specific penalties for delayed filings or for submitting incomplete or incorrect information. The latest Budget proposal seeks to close that gap, reinforcing the government’s message that compliance will be non-negotiable in the evolving digital asset landscape.

Previous Story

Indigenous Voices Cross Oceans

Next Story

Millions Of Cancers Preventable

Previous Story

Indigenous Voices Cross Oceans

Next Story

Millions Of Cancers Preventable

Latest from Economy

Asia’s Growth Holds Firm As AI Boom Builds

East Asia and the Pacific is forecast to grow 4.5% in 2026, with AI-related activity supporting growth while skills and adoption remain challenges….reports Asian Lite News Desk East Asia and the Pacific

AI, Energy, Debt: IMF’s Big Global Warning

IMF AI energy debt warning highlights growing risks to global growth as Kristalina Georgieva urges policymakers to tackle inflation, energy shocks and debt….reports Asian Lite News Desk Global economic growth is facing

Bhutan’s 770 MW Power Play With Adani

Adani Power and Bhutan’s DGPC will develop the 770 MW Chamkharchhu-I project, strengthening energy ties and opening the door to power exports to India….reports Asian Lite News Desk Adani Power and Bhutan’s
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Britain cracks down on misleading cryptocurrency ads

The UK authority plans to bring crypto-assets within the scope

Hunt to announce £4bn boost for childcare

One Treasury source suggested that the Department for Education could