December 29, 2025
3 mins read

Marmite Deodorant Tops Xmas Dud List

The findings shed light on how shoppers deal with unsuitable presents and highlight the importance of gift receipts and extended returns policies…reports Asian Lite News

Marmite-scented deodorant and already-worn pyjamas have topped the list of the most disappointing Christmas presents, according to research that found one in five Britons have received an unwanted gift in their festive haul. The study suggests that while many people accept such gifts with good grace, a significant proportion quietly dispose of them once the festive period is over.

More than 2,000 members of the public were polled by the consumer group Which? in January about the gifts they received last Christmas, with 21% of those surveyed saying they had been given an unwanted or unsuitable present. The research aimed to understand not only what types of gifts miss the mark, but also what recipients typically do when faced with something they neither want nor need.

Among the most frequently cited disappointments was deodorant with the fragrance of Marmite, a limited-edition product released by Unilever, which makes both the savoury spread and Lynx body spray. While novelty gifts often attract attention in the run-up to Christmas, respondents suggested that such items do not always translate into welcome surprises on Christmas morning.

Other examples of unwelcome presents included rotten coconut and pineapple, pointing to the risks of gifting perishable food items. One respondent also reported receiving a Tottenham Hotspur book that failed to impress because the recipient was a supporter of Chelsea rather than Tottenham Hotspur. The anecdote underlined how personal interests, particularly sporting loyalties, can make or break a gift.

The survey also highlighted cases where gifts were unsuitable rather than simply disappointing. One respondent who suffers from vertigo and has a fear of flying said they were given a helicopter ride by their daughter. While the intention may have been generous, the example illustrated how experiential gifts can backfire if the giver is unaware of health conditions or phobias.

When asked what they did with an unwanted gift, responses varied widely. A third, or 33%, of those surveyed said they kept the item and would use it despite their initial disappointment. A further 15% said they kept the gift but did not use it, suggesting that politeness or reluctance to offend often outweighs practicality.

Once the dust had settled on the festive celebrations, however, many respondents chose to part with their unwanted presents. A third, or 34%, said they got rid of the gift rather than returning or exchanging it. This indicates that despite the availability of returns policies, many people prefer to quietly move on from an unsuitable present rather than face the potential awkwardness of returning it.

Among the most popular options for passing on an unsuitable item was giving it to a friend or family member, a choice made by 12% of respondents. Another 10% said they donated the item to a charity shop, while 8% reported selling it on an online marketplace. These approaches reflect a desire to ensure the gift is still put to use, even if not by the original recipient.

Only a small minority opted for more direct or wasteful solutions. Just 2% of those surveyed said they had thrown an unwanted present away, while only 1% admitted to giving it back to the person who bought it for them. The figures suggest that most people seek to avoid outright rejection of a gift, even when it misses the mark.

“Our research shows that a fifth of us have been left wondering what to do with an unwanted gift,” said Lisa Webb, a consumer law expert at Which?. “It’s always worth getting a gift receipt so your loved one has the option to return their gift if needed.”

The consumer group pointed out that many retailers extend their returns policies over the festive period, offering shoppers additional time to return or exchange items bought as Christmas presents. This can allow recipients of disappointing gifts to obtain a refund, exchange the item for something more suitable, or opt for a voucher instead.

“Sometimes, for online orders, only the buyer can request a refund or exchange,” Webb added. “But if the item was marked as a gift when ordered, the retailer’s returns policy may enable a recipient to return or exchange it.” 

Previous Story

2025 sees highest British defence exports 

Next Story

UK sweats into records in 2025

Previous Story

2025 sees highest British defence exports 

Next Story

UK sweats into records in 2025

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Licences granted to nearly 200 care providers 

It will now prove an early test for Labour’s new

UK, Cambodia hold 2nd Joint Trade and Investment Forum 

The forum succeeded in its aims to assess progress, through