May 6, 2026
3 mins read

Bangladesh-US Trade Pact Faces Backlash Over “One Sided” Terms

Politicians and economists in Dhaka demand review of agreement criticised for placing heavy obligations on Bangladesh…reports Asian Lite News

A trade agreement signed between Bangladesh and the United States under the administration of former US President Donald Trump is facing growing criticism in Dhaka, with political leaders, economists and sections of the media describing the deal as heavily tilted in favour of Washington.

According to reports in leading Bangladeshi daily Prothom Alo, critics argue that the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) imposes extensive obligations on Bangladesh while offering relatively limited commitments from the United States.

The newspaper claimed the language and structure of the agreement reflected a significant imbalance between the two sides.

“The trade agreement with the United States imposes obligations on Bangladesh in a one sided manner. In comparison, the United States does not have to do much,” the report stated.

The criticism has focused particularly on the wording used throughout the 32 page agreement. According to the newspaper’s analysis, the term “shall”, which denotes mandatory obligations, appears 179 times in the document, while the more discretionary term “will” appears only three times.

The report further noted that the phrase “Bangladesh shall” appears 131 times, whereas “US shall” appears only six times, reinforcing concerns among critics that the agreement disproportionately binds Bangladesh to strict obligations.

The trade agreement was signed on February 9, just days before Bangladesh’s national parliamentary elections. Soon afterwards, the US Supreme Court annulled the imposition of reciprocal tariffs, further fuelling debate over the agreement’s relevance and long term implications.

Opposition leaders and economists in Bangladesh have increasingly questioned the terms of the deal and called for its reassessment.

Member of Parliament Rumeen Farhana has publicly demanded the cancellation of the agreement while speaking in parliament. Several political parties and civic organisations have also urged the government to scrap the deal altogether.

Economists quoted in the report suggested that Dhaka should reopen discussions with Washington in an effort to negotiate more balanced terms.

Although the agreement has not yet formally come into force, Bangladesh has already started signing import agreements for several American goods under its framework, prompting additional scrutiny from critics.

The report stated that the agreement consists of six core articles, while detailed implementation measures are laid out in annexes that form an integral part of the overall pact.

One of the key sections focuses on tariffs and quotas. Under the provisions, Bangladesh would be required to maintain fixed tariffs on American products and avoid imposing quotas on US imports, while the United States would apply specified tariff rates to Bangladeshi exports.

Another major area of concern relates to non tariff barriers. The agreement reportedly restricts Bangladesh from introducing regulations such as import licensing requirements, inspections, permits, documentation procedures or quality checks that could impede trade beyond tariff related measures.

According to the report, Bangladesh would not be permitted to require import licences for US goods if those products already comply with American or internationally recognised standards.

Additionally, if certification is issued by recognised government or international laboratories, Bangladesh would be unable to impose further conditions or testing requirements.

The agreement also includes provisions aimed at granting preferential market access for American agricultural products in Bangladesh.

However, the report noted that any restrictions introduced for health or safety reasons would need to be scientifically justified and risk based rather than designed to limit trade.

Critics have also expressed concern over provisions related to Geographical Indication protections, arguing that Bangladesh could face limitations in adopting standards that place US products at a competitive disadvantage compared to goods from other countries.

The controversy surrounding the agreement has intensified broader debates within Bangladesh over trade sovereignty, market access and the balance between attracting international economic partnerships and protecting domestic policy flexibility.

Previous Story

India, EU deepen green tech ties with EV battery push

Next Story

IWT: Why India’s Most Measured Response Deserves Benefit of Doubt

Previous Story

India, EU deepen green tech ties with EV battery push

Next Story

IWT: Why India’s Most Measured Response Deserves Benefit of Doubt

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.

UK and Germany Ratify Kensington Treaty

Britain and Germany ratify the Kensington Treaty, agreeing new cooperation on AI, quantum research, defence and security while targeting investment, jobs and Russian hybrid threats…reports Asian Lite News Desk Britain and Germany

Economic tide is turning in Bangladesh

If there is one thing that can bring some comfort to the struggling Bangladeshi economy, it is good relations with India. Bangladesh should remember that Delhi’s backing, through easy supplies of essentials
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Trump Claims Progress, Tehran Pushes Back

Iran denies seeking talks with Washington despite Donald Trump claiming

Geopolitics Of The Indo-Pacific

It is easy to understand why the Indo-Pacific is important