May 15, 2026
3 mins read

US Weighs Retreat in Adani Bribery Case

A New York Times report has claimed that the US Justice Department is considering dropping criminal charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani in a major bribery and securities investigation. The report comes as Adani’s legal team intensifies efforts to challenge the jurisdiction and legal basis of the case in American courts…reports Asian Lite News Desk

A New York Times report has claimed that the US Justice Department is considering dropping criminal charges against industrialist and Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani in a major development in the long running American investigation into alleged bribery and securities violations.

The report, published on Thursday local time, cited people familiar with the matter and suggested that prosecutors are now weighing whether to proceed with the case against Adani and other defendants.

The allegations were originally brought by the US Securities and Exchange Commission and federal prosecutors, who accused Gautam Adani, Sagar Adani and others of orchestrating an alleged bribery scheme worth more than 250 million US dollars between 2020 and 2024 to secure solar energy contracts in India.

According to the New York Times, the possible shift in the Justice Department’s approach comes after Adani hired a new legal team led by Robert J Giuffra Jr of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. Giuffra is also known as one of US President Donald Trump’s personal lawyers.

The newspaper reported that Giuffra met officials at the Justice Department headquarters in Washington last month. Citing people familiar with the meeting, the report said Adani’s lawyers argued that prosecutors lacked sufficient evidence and jurisdiction to pursue the case.

The report also claimed that Adani’s legal team indicated that the businessman could be prepared to invest 10 billion US dollars in the American economy, potentially creating 15,000 jobs, if the charges were dropped.

According to the New York Times, prosecutors told the legal team that any such investment would have no bearing on the criminal proceedings. However, the report stated that one Justice Department official responded positively to the proposal during discussions.

The claims have not been independently confirmed by the Justice Department, which has not publicly commented on the report.

Earlier this month, the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York accepted a plea filed by lawyers representing Gautam and Sagar Adani seeking a pre motion conference aimed at dismissing the case.

In a letter submitted to the court, the defendants’ lawyers stated that they intended to seek dismissal of the SEC complaint on several grounds, including lack of personal jurisdiction and what they described as the impermissibly extraterritorial nature of the allegations.

The lawyers argued that the SEC’s claims related to conduct involving Indian defendants, an Indian issuer and transactions conducted outside the United States.

According to the filing, Adani Green Energy Ltd conducted a 750 million US dollar bond offering in September 2021 under SEC Rule 144A and Regulation S, both of which provide exemptions for certain private resales and non US sales.

The defence said the bonds were sold outside the United States through agreements with non US underwriters, who later resold portions of the notes to qualified institutional buyers. The filing argued that Adani Green Energy Ltd was not involved in those later transactions.

The defendants also contended that the alleged misstatements identified by the SEC were too vague and general for investors to reasonably rely upon and therefore could not support fraud claims.

The filing further argued that the defendants neither operated in the United States nor engaged in activities that would give American courts jurisdiction over the matter.

Lawyers for the Adanis stated in the filing that “the claims involve Indian Defendants, an Indian issuer, securities not registered with the SEC and not traded on U.S. exchanges, and underlying conduct alleged to have occurred exclusively in India.”

The legal challenge is expected to play a central role in determining whether the case proceeds in the US courts in the coming months.

Previous Story

Trump invites Xi to White House

Next Story

South Africa Says BRICS More Crucial Than Ever

Previous Story

Trump invites Xi to White House

Next Story

South Africa Says BRICS More Crucial Than Ever

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

India, US step up semiconductor and AI partnership

Officials discuss stronger cooperation on semiconductors, AI, trusted supply chains

New US bill granting work permit to H-1B spouses introduced

The new bill aims to grant the spouses of H-1B