March 24, 2026
5 mins read

Why Gulf Oil Turbulence Hits Pakistan Harder Than Most

The country has no strategic petroleum reserve to buffer against external shocks. Legally mandated commercial stocks should cover 22 days, but in practice the effective range fluctuates between 10 and 28 days. This means that every dollar added to global crude prices shows up at Pakistani pumps within two weeks, and at grocery shelves a month later, as transport and logistics costs ripple through the economy, writes Dr Sakariya Kareem

The PKR 55 per litre increase announced at the outset of the Iran war landed like a jolt for ordinary Pakistanis, but in truth it was the predictable output of Pakistan’s pricing architecture, a system designed in such a way that global volatility flows almost unfiltered into domestic markets. Three structural features make this unavoidable.

First, Pakistan uses Import Parity Pricing, which pegs domestic fuel prices to international benchmarks every fortnight, leaving almost no cushion between global shocks and the retail pump. Second, the country imports more than 80 percent of its oil consumption and maintains almost no government‑managed strategic reserves. Third, it sources the overwhelming majority of its petroleum from Gulf producers whose shipments pass through a single maritime chokepoint: the Strait of Hormuz. When that corridor becomes unstable, Pakistan feels the tremors almost instantly.

This is precisely what is happening now. With tensions rising in the Gulf and traders pricing in the risk of supply disruption, Brent crude has surged. For Pakistan, which relies on the UAE for 50–56 percent of its petroleum imports and Saudi Arabia for another 30–35 percent, even a hint of instability in the region translates into higher freight insurance premiums, elevated spot prices, and a rapid pass‑through to domestic fuel costs. Analysts warn that a sustained closure of Hormuz could push Brent beyond its 2008 peak of USD 147 per barrel, with some projections reaching USD 200. In such a scenario, Pakistan’s vulnerability becomes acute.

File photo shows a motorcyclist drives past a closed fuel station in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.(Xinhua/Ahmad Kamal/IANS)

The country has no strategic petroleum reserve to buffer against external shocks. Legally mandated commercial stocks should cover 22 days, but in practice the effective range fluctuates between 10 and 28 days. This means that every dollar added to global crude prices shows up at Pakistani pumps within two weeks, and at grocery shelves a month later, as transport and logistics costs ripple through the economy. The Rs55 hike is therefore not merely a price adjustment; it is the first visible wave of a broader inflationary tide.

The government, aware of the storm gathering offshore, has begun urging citizens to adopt austerity measures. Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Attaullah Tarar has appealed for reduced travel, greater carpooling, work‑from‑home arrangements, and expanded e‑learning in educational institutions. The state has attempted to lead by example, grounding 60 percent of government vehicles and mandating a 50 percent reduction in petrol usage across all departments. These steps reflect both urgency and constraint: Pakistan is under an IMF stabilization programme that sharply limits its ability to subsidize fuel or absorb price shocks. The last time the government attempted to shield consumers,  through the 2022 fuel subsidy,  the budget deficit ballooned to 9 percent of GDP, a mistake the Fund will not allow to be repeated.

The inflationary consequences are already unfolding. Transport fares have risen by up to 20 percent across goods carriers, intercity buses, railways and airlines. Higher freight costs inevitably push up the prices of food and other essentials, squeezing households whose purchasing power has been eroded by years of high inflation. Industries dependent on fuel for production and logistics face yet another blow to their competitiveness, compounding an already difficult business environment marked by high energy tariffs, currency volatility and weak demand. In Pakistan’s inflationary ecosystem, fuel is not just another commodity; it is the central node through which cost pressures propagate.

Yet Pakistan’s vulnerabilities are not confined to oil dependence alone. The fiscal position is deteriorating at a moment when resilience is most needed. The government is facing a revenue shortfall of over Rs657 billion. The IMF’s second review flagged a Rs157 billion gap in petroleum levy collections, while the Federal Board of Revenue has acknowledged a Rs430 billion shortfall in tax collections for July–February 2026. These gaps must be filled through contingency measures ,  most likely higher taxes on already strained sectors ,  further tightening the screws on economic activity.

Foreign exchange reserves, too, remain fragile. A three‑month closure of Hormuz would push Pakistan’s monthly oil import bill from USD 1.2–1.5 billion to USD 3.5–4.5 billion, rapidly draining reserves and forcing the government into emergency financing arrangements. Alternative routing through Saudi or UAE pipelines offers little relief, as freight and insurance costs rise by 150 to 200 percent. In such a scenario, Pakistan’s external account would come under severe pressure, potentially triggering currency depreciation that would amplify inflation even further.

There are, however, tools that could soften the blow. Oil hedging  used widely by energy‑importing countries  remains one of the few immediately actionable options. If Pakistan State Oil hedged just 20 percent of its import volume at a USD 90 per barrel cap, analysts estimate the inflationary pass‑through could be halved, saving roughly USD 800 million annually. But hedging requires institutional capacity, regulatory clarity and political consensus  all areas where Pakistan has historically struggled.

Ultimately, the Rs55 increase is not an aberration; it is a symptom of a deeper structural fragility. Pakistan’s exposure to Gulf oil shocks is the product of policy choices made over decades,  choices that left the country without strategic reserves, without diversified energy sources, without fiscal buffers, and without the institutional tools to manage volatility. Until these foundations are rebuilt, every tremor in the Gulf will continue to send shockwaves through Pakistan’s economy, tightening the squeeze on households, businesses and the state itself.

Newsdesk

Newsdesk

Aravind Rajeev is Deputy News Editor at Asian Lite, mostly covering the Middle East and GCC. He has over eight years of experience as a journalist, with a background in ground-level reporting, crime reporting, as well as international and regional news.

Previous Story

India’s 35 Million Diaspora Seen as Key to 2047 Vision

Next Story

Educated, then excluded: Pakistan’s girls and the system that stops short

Previous Story

India’s 35 Million Diaspora Seen as Key to 2047 Vision

Next Story

Educated, then excluded: Pakistan’s girls and the system that stops short

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Justice Bandial takes oath as CJP

Justice Umar Ata Bandialcriticised Pakistani mainstream media and social media

Pak wants Afghanistan to break ties with India: Karzai

Karzai said that Pakistan must know that it cannot win