September 3, 2024
2 mins read

Rahul hails SC’s observations, slams BJP’s ‘bulldozer policy’

Rahul Gandhi added that the country will be run according to B.R. Ambedkar’s Constitution, and not by the rule of power…reports Asian Lite News

The Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Monday hailed the Supreme Court which came down heavily on ‘bulldozer justice’, questioning how can a house be demolished just because it belongs to an accused or even a convict in a criminal case.

A bench headed by Justice B.R. Gavai stressed that even unauthorised construction has to be demolished in “accordance with law” and state authorities cannot resort to demolition of property of accused as a punishment.

Welcoming the top court’s observations, Rahul Gandhi said in a post on X that the “anti-constitutional face of the BJP, which crushes humanity and justice under the bulldozer, has now been exposed in front of the country”.

“The bulldozer, which has become a symbol of unbridled power, has continuously challenged the law with arrogance by trampling on civil rights and freedom,” he said.

The Congress leader added that under the guise of ‘quick justice’, the households of the Bahujans and the poor often suffer due to the bulldozer policy implemented by the BJP governments across the country to establish “rule of fear”.

“We hope that the Supreme Court will issue clear guidelines on this very sensitive subject and protect the citizens from this ‘anti-democratic campaign’ of the BJP governments in several states across the country,” the Congress leader said.

He added that the country will be run according to B.R. Ambedkar’s Constitution, and not by the rule of power.

Earlier, the Supreme Court mulled the formation of pan-India guidelines against the demolition of property of individuals accused of committing criminal offences.

The Bench, also comprising Justice K.V. Viswanathan, remarked that not only an accused, but the house of a convict can also not meet such a fate, clarifying the apex court‘s intention to not protect unauthorised structures.

Posting the matter for hearing after two weeks, it asked parties to place on record their suggestions for framing of guidelines.

Echoing similar views, Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, stated that no immovable property should be demolished because the owner/occupant is alleged to have been involved in the commission of an offence.

He also said that the state authorities in Uttar Pradesh took action in accordance with the municipal law after the violators did not reply to the show-cause notices issued to them.

ALSO READ: Defence Ministry to take up mega warship, battle tank projects

Previous Story

Congress’ Haryana list to be out in two days

Next Story

US slams China’s aggressive actions in South China Sea 

Latest from -Top News

NATO Bolsters Baltic Defense

NATO plans to strengthen its Baltic Sea presence with an enhanced vigilance initiative, as announced during a major summit in Helsinki….reports Asian Lite News NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced the plan

Gaza’s Hope for Peace

Over the past 15 months, the Palestinian death toll from ongoing Israeli strikes in Gaza has risen to 46,645…reports Asian Lite News Over 2.2 million people in Gaza are closely following the

Gaza Ceasefire Nears Final Stages: Qatar

Israeli forces would vacate the Philadelphi Corridor along the Egyptian border and the Netzarim Corridor separating Gaza’s north and south….reports Asian Lite News “Qatar’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Majed Al Ansari announced on

Biden Hails US Efforts in Ukraine Crisis

Biden emphasised that under his leadership, “America is stronger” with stronger alliances and weaker adversaries and competitors…reports Asian Lite News US President Joe Biden reflected on his administration’s response to Russia’s invasion
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Nishad claims 15 seats, BJP yet to confirm

The Nirbal Indian Shoshit Hamara Aaam Dal, or Nishad party,

LinkedIn cuts 716 jobs, shuts China app

The company’s CEO Ryan Roslansky said in an email to