September 8, 2025
2 mins read

Quad or RICJ? Asia’s Power Puzzle Shifts

When the West was watching a possible Russia-India-China (RIC) axis take form in Tianjin, there were some murmurs that Japan — not part of SCO — could be the fourth corner of a new Quad….reports Asian Lite News

En route to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin, China, Prime Minister Narendra Modi paid a two-day official visit to Japan in late August.

In deliberations with the then Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba of Japan, the two premiers appreciated the partnership over the last decade and held discussions on ways to strengthen it.

The two countries adopted a 10-year roadmap to deepen the India-Japan Special Strategic and Global Partnership. This included Japan committing to double its investment in India to JPY 10 trillion (roughly USD 67 billion).

India and Japan also pledged to work jointly in other areas, including high-speed rail, metro systems, enhancing financial, SME, agri-business, and ICT collaboration etc.

Around the same time, Japan’s top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa called off his US visit at the last minute. The sudden decision was linked to bilateral issues that still needed to be debated at the administrative level.

Dispute continued over Washington saying that President Donald Trump will have “complete discretion” over how Japan’s USD 550 billion in investments and loans are allocated to the US under the two countries’ tariff deal.

However, on September 4, US President Donald Trump signed an executive, applying a baseline 15 per cent tariff on nearly all Japanese imports.

The agreement, said White House, lowered tariffs on Japanese automobiles from 25 to 15 per cent and included Tokyo’s investment commitment.

Incidentally, the India-Japan deal and the reduction of US tariffs were among the key wins for Ishiba.

On Sunday, he said that the decision to step down came when Japan’s negotiations with the US had reached a conclusion.

When the West was watching a possible Russia-India-China (RIC) axis take form in Tianjin, there were some murmurs that Japan — not part of SCO — could be the fourth corner of a new Quad.

There was a thought that RIC could get Japan’s support in its defence against the US tariffs. Now, Ishiba’s abrupt departure from Japan’s premiership has injected fresh uncertainty into Tokyo’s strategic pivot.

A cohesive grouping of China, Russia, India, and Japan could likely encompass roughly one-third of global GDP and nearly 40 per cent of the world’s population, giving it an unprecedented scale.

China and Japan alone account for over half of that bloc’s total output, while India’s rapid growth and Russia’s energy exports bolster collective resources. Economically, such a coalition could reshape trade routes, investment patterns, and technology standards across Eurasia.

Now, across East and Southeast Asia, governments need to recalibrate trade and investment priorities in light of Japan’s internal transition and US protectionism.

China, ever-adept at filling vacuums, is likely to intensify its overtures via the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). South Korea and ASEAN economies, facing competitive pressures, may accelerate efforts to establish alternative free-trade architectures independent of US tariffs.

Over time, the speculations over a possible RICJ-led defence against trade tariffs will be answered with a new Prime Minister of Japan assuming office.

Previous Story

How are Bangladesh’s shifting alliances working against it?

Next Story

BRICS: Jaishankar Flags Trade Barriers

Previous Story

How are Bangladesh’s shifting alliances working against it?

Next Story

BRICS: Jaishankar Flags Trade Barriers

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.

UK and Germany Ratify Kensington Treaty

Britain and Germany ratify the Kensington Treaty, agreeing new cooperation on AI, quantum research, defence and security while targeting investment, jobs and Russian hybrid threats…reports Asian Lite News Desk Britain and Germany

Economic tide is turning in Bangladesh

If there is one thing that can bring some comfort to the struggling Bangladeshi economy, it is good relations with India. Bangladesh should remember that Delhi’s backing, through easy supplies of essentials
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Mao Zedong returns to China’s Generation Z

It must find a way to placate or tame this

IAF Chief, B’desh military brass discuss boosting defence ties

During his visit, the CAS also interacted with the High