February 21, 2022
2 mins read

Quad is not Asian NATO, says Jaishankar

He said that India’s relations with the United States, Japan and Australia have steadily improved in the last 20 years…reports Asian Lite News

Rejecting the notion that the Quad is an Asian NATO, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said there are “interested parties” who advance such analogies and one should not slip into it.

“Quad is a grouping of four countries who have a common interests, common values, great deal of comfort, who happen to be located in the four corners of the Indo-Pacific who found out that in this world no country, not even the United States has the ability to address big global challenges all on their own,” Jaishankar said on Saturday while participating in a panel discussion on ‘A Sea Change? Regional Order and Security in the Indo-Pacific’ at the Munich Security Conference (MSC) 2022.

“I would urge you not to slip into that lazy analogy of an Asian-NATO. It isn’t because there are three countries who are treaty allies. We are not a treaty ally. It doesn’t have a treaty, a structure, a secretariat, it’s a kind of 21st century way of responding to a more diversified, dispersed world,” he said on the Quad grouping which has the United States, India, Australia and Japan as its members.

Jaishankar clarified that the present incarnation of Quad started in 2017 and is not a post-2020 development referring to the tension along the Line of Actual Control in eastern Ladakh with China.

He said that India’s relations with the United States, Japan and Australia have steadily improved in the last 20 years.

Mentioning that the Quad has value in itself, the EAM said it is four countries that recognize today that the world would be a better place if they are cooperating and that is what is happening.

“The first time Quad countries came together was in 2004 in response to the Tsunami. Then their representatives met in 2007 in Manila but the countries then were not invested politically in it so they let it fritter away,” he said.

The Quad partners again met a decade later in 2017, this time at a higher level. In 2019, it became Minister’s level and 2021 it became a summit, Jaishankar informed.

“It’s in a sense natural, as you are sitting in Europe, but all of us pull out concepts from pre-existing lexicon to say that it an Asian NATO, because it is convenient though, a completely misleading term and also there are some parties who advance that kind of an analogy,” he observed.

“Our Prime Minister used this term, ‘Quad is a force for global good”, the EAM said.

“What’s the Quad doing, the Quad is trying to supply a billion vaccines that are US IPR, manufactured in India funded, logistically supported by Japan, Australia as well as the two of us,” he stated.

ALSO READ-UP registers 60%, Punjab 65% polling

Previous Story

UP registers 60%, Punjab 65% polling

Next Story

India, France agree on blue economy roadmap and ocean governance

Previous Story

UP registers 60%, Punjab 65% polling

Next Story

India, France agree on blue economy roadmap and ocean governance

Latest from -Top News

Pakistan Risks Overstretching Itself in Yemen War

Pakistan’s expanding military role in Saudi Arabia amid the Yemen conflict could strain its defence resources and fragile finances…reports Asian Lite News Desk Pakistan’s military involvement in the war in Yemen may prove unsustainable because of mounting financial pressures and competing security demands, according to a new report. Islamabad’s growing military presence in Saudi Arabia risks stretching its defence resources while exposing the country to greater strategic and economic challenges. An article by Andrew Wilson in One World Outlook describes Pakistan’s involvement as a case of “fiscal and strategic overreach”, arguing that the country lacks the financial flexibility to sustain an expanded military commitment. Pakistan’s external finances depend heavily on an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, financial support from Gulf countries and remittances from Pakistani workers in the region. The report argues that deeper military involvement in the conflict could place additional pressure on these sources of financial stability. It also warns that deploying troops and military equipment abroad could weaken Pakistan’s capacity to address security challenges along its eastern border and deal with two domestic insurgencies. The move could also draw Islamabad into a conflict it has sought to approach cautiously. A Reuters report in May, citing Pakistani security and government sources, said Islamabad had deployed around 8,000 troops, a squadron of approximately 16 aircraft, mostly JF-17 fighter jets, two drone squadrons and a Chinese HQ-9 air-defence battery to Saudi Arabia. According to those sources, Riyadh was financing the deployment, with Pakistani personnel operating the equipment. The sources also said a confidential agreement contemplated the possibility of deploying up to 80,000 troops. Islamabad has not confirmed those figures, although it has acknowledged its military presence in Saudi Arabia, including the deployment of fighter jets at King Abdulaziz Air Base from April. The One World Outlook article argues that Saudi financial support can cover allowances and operating expenses but cannot easily replace military equipment needed elsewhere or resolve the political and strategic challenges of participating in the Yemen conflict. Pakistan’s defence budget is another concern. For the 2026-27 financial year, the federal government allocated PKR 3 trillion, or approximately $10.8 billion, to defence services. The allocation represents an 18 per cent increase from the original PKR 2.55 trillion provision and amounts to around 2.1 per cent of projected gross domestic product (GDP). Defence spending accounts for approximately 16 per cent of the federal government’s PKR 18.8 trillion expenditure. Military pensions are budgeted separately at PKR 822 billion, while debt servicing costs stand at approximately PKR 8 trillion, more than two-and-a-half times the defence allocation. The report argues that these competing financial obligations leave little room for additional military expenditure without placing further pressure on public finances. Pakistan’s reliance on IMF assistance also limits its fiscal flexibility. The country must meet the conditions attached to the programme, including a primary budget surplus target of 2 per cent of GDP and continued restraint on development spending. According to the article, these requirements make it difficult for Islamabad to finance an additional military commitment without compromising other budgetary priorities. Pakistan’s economic indicators offer limited reassurance. Economic growth for the 2025-26 financial year is estimated at between 3.6 and 3.7 per cent, while inflation reached approximately 10.3 per cent in September following an energy price shock. Foreign exchange reserves stood at around $21.5 billion at the end of September. Although this marks an improvement from the low levels recorded in 2023, the report notes that the reserves cover only a few months of imports. Financial assistance from Gulf partners remains central to Pakistan’s external stability. The article says Islamabad holds approximately $8 billion in Saudi deposits at its central bank. In July, the State Bank of Pakistan said Riyadh had extended the maturity of $5 billion in deposits to December 2028, easing the country’s immediate external financing requirements. A further $3 billion deposit was also extended in the spring. However, the article argues that these arrangements provide temporary relief rather than long-term financial independence, particularly as regional conflict threatens the stability of the Gulf economies on which Pakistan relies. The report concludes that Pakistan faces a difficult balance between supporting Saudi Arabia militarily and preserving the financial and military resources needed to address its domestic and regional challenges.
Go toTop

Don't Miss

NATO chief makes surprise visit to Kyiv

Ukraine claimed to have successfully repelled 55 ground assaults in

Jaishankar slams criticism of India’s purchase of Russian oil 

Criticising Europe’s “selective approach,” Jaishankar asked why Europe has itself